Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bushara vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 14420 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14420 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Bushara vs State Of Kerala on 31 May, 2024

Author: A.Muhamed Mustaque

Bench: A.Muhamed Mustaque

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
                                     &
                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU
        FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                        WP(CRL.) NO. 454 OF 2024
PETITIONER :-

            BUSHARA, AGED 39 YEARS
            W/O MUHAMMED ASHARAF, KUNNAPPALLI, KAYILIAD,
            CHALAVARA, PALAKKAD, PIN - 679122

            BY ADVS.
            M.H.HANIS
            P.M.JINIMOL
            T.N.LEKSHMI SHANKAR
            NANCY MOL P.
            ANANDHU P.C.
            NEETHU.G.NADH
            CIYA E.J.


RESPONDENTS :-

    1       STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO
            GOVERNMENT, HOME AND VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT,
            GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,, PIN - 695001

    2       THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,
            PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678001

    3       THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
            PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678001

    4       THE CHAIRMAN
            ADVISORY BOARD, KAAPA, SREENIVAS, PADAM ROAD,
            VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, ELAMAKKARA, PIN - 682006

    5       THE SUPERINTENDENT OF JAIL,
            CENTRAL JAIL, VIYYUR, PIN - 670004

            BY ADVS.
            ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA
            ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION(AG-11)
 WP(CRL.) NO. 454 OF 2024
                                 2



            ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(AG-28)
            SRI.K.A.ANAS, PP


     THIS    WRIT   PETITION   (CRIMINAL)   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION ON 31.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(CRL.) NO. 454 OF 2024
                                         3




                                   JUDGMENT

S MANU, J

The petitioner is the wife of Sri.Muhammed Ashraf @ Adakka

Asaru. The detenu is 40 years old. He has been detained in Central

Prison, Viyyur in execution of Ext.P1 order dated 08.04.2024 issued

by the 2nd respondent, invoking powers vested with him under the

Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007.

2. The petitioner has been detained on account of his

involvement in three different cases registered by Cherpulassery

Police Station and Perinthalmanna Police Station. The details of the

cases are as follows :-

1. Crime No.19/2020 of Cherupulassery Police Station U/s.489(B) and 489(C) r/w 34 of IPC.

2. Crime No.9/2022 of Cherupulassery Excise Range U/s.20(b)

(ii)(B), 60(3), 32(B)(a) of NDPS Act.

3. Crime No.1000/2023 of Perinthalmanna Police Station U/s.20(b)(ii) C, 29 of NDPS Act.

3. It is to be noted that Crime No.1000/2023 registered on

11.07.2023 is the last prejudicial activity taken into the account by

the Detaining Authority. Though the offence was committed in the WP(CRL.) NO. 454 OF 2024

said crime on 11.07.2023, the detention order has been issued only

on 08.04.2024 after long lapse of time.

4. During the course of hearing, the learned Public

Prosecutor pointed out that the delay has been explained in Ext.P1

order. He points out that the Detaining Authority has stated that the

detenu is in judicial custody in Crime No.1000/2023 involving the

offence under the NDPS Act and therefore, the probability of his

release on bail is less. Therefore the detaining authority did not

issue the order immediately. The detention order was issued only

when it was felt that the detenu may file bail application after two or

three remand periods. It is also pointed out that the Detaining

Authority has recorded the date of proposal etc and therefore, no

delay is involved and there is proper application of mind by the

Detaining Authority.

5. We are unable to accept the contention raised by the

learned Public Prosecutor. There is a long delay of about 9 months

in passing the order of detention. The explanation in the detention

order is insufficient to satisfy the court about the nexus, which is a

mandatory requirement. In view of the long delay involved, we think

that the objective of detention is defeated in this case and the live WP(CRL.) NO. 454 OF 2024

link was snapped long ago. Therefore, we are not in a position to

approve the detention. The order of detention is therefore quashed.

The detenu shall be released forthwith, if custody is not required in

any other proceedings. The order shall be communicated to the

Superintendent of Central Prison, Viyyur immediately.

This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE

Sd/-

S.MANU JUDGE SMA WP(CRL.) NO. 454 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 454/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS :-

Exhibit -P1 A TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO. DCPKD/16060/2023- S1 DATED 08.04.2024 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter