Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ayishabi Thcharakkunnummal vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 14408 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14408 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Ayishabi Thcharakkunnummal vs State Of Kerala on 31 May, 2024

Author: A.Muhamed Mustaque

Bench: A.Muhamed Mustaque

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
                                   &
                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU
        FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                        WP(CRL.) NO. 472 OF 2024
PETITIONER :-

           AYISHABI THCHARAKKUNNUMMAL, AGED 50 YEARS
           W/O SIRAJUDHEEN, KADUMODIYIL HOUSE, PATTISSERY,
           NELLAYA, PALAKKAD, PIN - 679335

            BY ADV M.H.HANIS


RESPONDENTS :-

    1       STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO
            GOVERNMENT, HOME AND VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT
            SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,, PIN - 695001

    2       THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
            PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678001

    3       THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
            PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678001

    4       THE CHAIRMAN
            ADVISORY BOARD, KAAPA, SREENIVAS, PADAM ROAD,
            VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, ELAMAKKARA, PIN - 682026

    5       THE SUPERINTENDENT OF JAIL
            CENTRAL JAIL, VIYYUR, PIN - 670004

            BY ADVS.
            ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA
            ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION(AG-11)
            ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(AG-28)
            SRI.K.A.ANAS, PP


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(CRL.) NO. 472 OF 2024
                                   2

                              JUDGMENT

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J

The petitioner is the mother of the detenu. The detenu is 23

years old. He has been detained under the provisions of the Kerala

Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007. He is involved in 6

crimes. They are Crime Nos.161/2022, 743/2023 and 344/2023 of

Cherpulassery Police Station, Crime No.405/2023 of Puthucadu

Police Station, Crime No.750/2023 of Manjeri Police Station, Crime

No.1051/2022 of Ollur Police Station..

2. The last prejudicial activity was on 13.10.2023. The

detenu was arrested on 04.01.2024 and he was ordered to be

released on bail on 09.04.2024. The detention order was passed on

30.03.2024.The detention order was executed on 05.04.2024.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that

there is a considerable delay in passing the detention order. The

total delay is 5 months and 16 days. It is submitted that absolutely

no reason was assigned in the impugned order as the reason for

the delay.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that reasons

are assigned and it was due to administrative exigencies, WP(CRL.) NO. 472 OF 2024

Sponsoring Authority could not file a report within time.

5. It is to be noted that some of the cases are under

investigation. We also note the reason assigned for the delay, it is

stated that due to large number of applications were received in

relation to Nava Kerala Sabha, the Police could not submit report

within time. It is to be noted that administrative exigencies of the

department not related to the collection of reports related to the

person to be detained, cannot be an excuse for passing an order at

a belated stage. There must be a link between last prejudicial

activity and date on which the detention order is passed. The

purpose of detention order is to prevent commission of offence, if it

is found that the person against whom the detention order is

passed has a proclivity or tendency to repeat the commission of

such offences. There should be a prompt action on the part of

Sponsoring Authority to report such matter before the Detention

Authority.

6. In this matter, we are of the view that there is a

considerable delay between the last prejudicial activity and the

date of submission of the report. Accordingly, we find the live-link

between the last prejudicial activity and the detention order has WP(CRL.) NO. 472 OF 2024

been snapped.

Thus, we are of the view that this is a fit case where the

impugned order has to be set aside and we direct the prison

authorities to release the detenu forthwith, if his custody is not

otherwise required under law.

This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE

Sd/-

S.MANU JUDGE SMA WP(CRL.) NO. 472 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 472/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS :-

Exhibit -P1 A TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.

DCPKD/14444/2023-S1 DATED 30.03.2024 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter