Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13643 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2024
WP(C) No.18810/2024 1/4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
Monday, the 27th day of May 2024 / 6th Jyaishta, 1946
WP(C).NO.18810 OF 2024(A)
PETITIONER:
SREENI PARAMESWARAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O M.G.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,
VILLA NO.1, MYSTIC BELLS, KANIYAMPUZHA ROAD, EROOR P.O., ERNAKULAM
DISTRICT, PIN - 682306
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE TAHSILDAR, ASSESSING AUTHORITY, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM
DISTRICT, PIN - 683 513
2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL
OFFICE, FORT KOCHI, PIN - 682 001
3. THE SUB REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, CHENGAMANADU
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 578
Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
pleased to issue interim orders directing the 3rd respondent to register
the documents submitted by the petitioner with respect to the
apartments/villas constructed and allotted to prospective purchaser in the
properties covered under Ext P2 order dated 19/01/2024 pending
consideration of the writ petition, in the interest of justice.
This petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and
the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of
SRI. P.B.KRISHNAN(Sr) alongwith SRI. ARAVIND.S.S , Advocate for the
petitioners and of the GOVERNMENT PLEADER, the court passed the following:
WP(C) No.18810/2024 2/4
C.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.18810 of 2024
------------------------------------
Dated, this the 27th May, 2024
O R D E R
Having heard the learned Senior Counsel
Sri.P.B.Krishnan, duly instructed by
Sri.S.S.Aravind, on behalf of the petitioner and
the learned Government Pleader, this Court finds
that, Ext.P9 prima facie reflects non compliance
of Ext.P8 order, where there is a specific
direction to the 1st respondent to ascertain
whether the security offered by the petitioner is
sufficient to satisfy the demand raised. This
Court also notice that, this is the third round of
litigation in respect of the same cause of action.
The matter was originally considered by a learned
Senior Judge, from which an appeal was carried
before the Division Bench. Alleging non compliance
thereof, a second writ petition was filed. The
- 2 -
order in that writ petition was also challenged
before the Division Bench and the Division Bench
ultimately passed Ext.P8 order with the above
referred specific direction.
2. In the said facts and circumstances, this Court
is of the opinion that the 1st respondent/Tahsildar
shall personally swear to an affidavit stating the
reason for non compliance of Ext.P8 order within a
period of seven days from today(27.05.2024). In
case he fails to do so, he shall be personally
present before this Court when the matter is taken
up for consideration on 03.06.2024.
Handover
Sd/-
C.JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE TR
27-05-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18810/2024 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 19/01/2024 Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WA NO.545/2024 DATED 12/04/2024 Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 17/05/2024
27-05-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!