Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13156 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2024 / 2ND JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 29728 OF 2018
PETITIONER:
HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVERAGES PVT.LTD.
CHITTUR, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED
SIGNATORY MR.RANJITH N.M.
BY ADVS.
A. KUMAR
P.J. ANILKUMAR
G. MINI
P.S. SREE PRASAD
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ASSESSMENT)
SPECIAL CIRCLE, COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD-678001.
2 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)-I
KOTTAYAM AT ERNAKULAM, COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM-
682016
3 SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
ADDITIONAL BENCH, PALAKKAD-678001.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI. VENUGOPAL V (GP)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P (C) No.29728/2018 -2-
JUDGMENT
Assessment of the petitioner under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 for
the assessment year 2008-09 was completed. Being aggrieved by the said
assessment the petitioner approached the First Appellate Authority also
raising a contention regarding limitation. However, the First Appellate
Authority did not interfere with the findings of the Assessing Authority. The
petitioner filed a further appeal before the Appellate Tribunal along with an
application for stay.
2. The petitioner has approached this court being aggrieved by the
fact that pending consideration of the matter by the Appellate Tribunal,
proceedings are being initiated to recover the balance of the amount assessed
as due after adjusting nearly Rs.5.50 lakhs from the refunds due to the
petitioner. According to the petitioner by such adjustment more than 50% of
the demand has been satisfied. This court on 25-09-2018 passed the following
order.
"This court cannot consider the stay application because it is in unnumbered appeal with a delay of 435 days. The petitioner's counsel represents that there is already a delay condonation petition pending before the 3rd respondent. Given the persistent plea of Revenue Recovery by the petitioner's counsel, the Tribunal may consider the delay condition petition early."
The matter has not been posted thereafter. It is apparent that the reliefs
sought for in this writ petition have become infructuous by the passage of
time. If the appeal filed by the petitioner is still pending before the Tribunal, it
is open to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal for early disposal of the
appeal.
Writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P. JUDGE
AMG
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 29728/2018
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29/3/2014
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY DATED 23/6/2016
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE MEMORANDUM DATED 2/11/2017
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY DATED 28/8/2018
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 9/8/2018
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!