Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13100 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2024
W. P. (C) No. 21922 of 2023
..1..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2024 / 2ND JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 21922 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
P.MUHAMMED HAJI, AGED 70 YEARS,
S/O. ABU, SEENATH, VELLAMUNDA, KATTAYADU.P.O.,
WAYANAD, PIN - 670731.
BY ADVS.M/S.M.SASINDRAN & P.K.SUBHASH
RESPONDENTS:
1 VELLAMUNDA GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KATTAYADU.P.O.,
VELLAMUNDA,WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN - 670731.
2 THE SECRETARY,
VELLAMUNDA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,KATTAYADU.P.O.,
VELLAMUNDA,WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN - 670731.
BY SRI. M.A.ASIF, SC, VELLAMUNDA GRAMA PANCHAYAT
ADV.SRI.K.S.ARUN KUMAR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 23.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W. P. (C) No. 21922 of 2023
..2..
MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. , J.
====================================
W. P. (C) No. 21922 of 2023
====================================
Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2024
JUDGMENT
The petitioner challenges Ext.P-1 order issued by the respondents
directing him to remove the unauthorised showcases/structures put up in
the corridor of the shopping complex.
2. The counter affidavit filed by the Panchayat shows that the
petitioner was served with Ext.P-1 on 21.6.2023 directing him to
demolish the unauthorised construction within 7 days. The petitioner had
submitted a reply on 27.6.2023 and after the Panchayat considered the
objections on 1.7.2023, finding the reply to be unsatisfactory, the
petitioner was again served with a notice on 1.7.2023 directing
demolition of all the unauthorised structures put up without the prior
permission of the Panchayat on or before 3.7.2023. The Panchayat
submits that the petitioner refused to receive the said notice after reading
its contents. Thereafter, on 5.7.2023, again another notice was served
..3..
directing the demolition of the unauthorised constructions.
3. The Writ Petition was filed on 4.7.2023 and an interim order was
passed on the ground that the petitioner was not heard before issuing
Ext.P-1. The said interim order is still in force. Given the contention of
the Panchayat in their statement that, final orders were already passed
which the petitioner refused to accept, there will be a direction to the
respondents to serve a copy of the final order on the petitioner, either
personally or through registered post, if not already done, within ten days
from today. The interim order passed by this Court will continue for a
further period of three weeks from today to enable the petitioner to work
out his remedies if so advised.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. , JUDGE MMG
..4..
APPENDIX OF WP(C).NO.21922/2023
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.
400998/BAUV01/GPO/2023/5188(1) DATED 21.06.2023 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS PANCHAYATH.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY TO EXHIBIT P1 COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS PANCHAYATH DATED 27.6.2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!