Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12948 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 May, 2024
WP(C) No.15914/2024 1/4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
Wednesday, the 22nd day of May 2024 / 1st Jyaishta, 1946
WP(C) NO. 15914 OF 2024(L)
PETITIONERS:
1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
(DEFENCE), MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110011
2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL, DIRECTOR GENERAL DSC, GENERAL STAFF
BRANCH INTEGRATED HQ OF MOD (ARMY) WEST BLOCK-III, R K PURAM, NEW
DELHI, PIN - 110011
3. SENIOR RECORD OFFICER DSC RECORDS MILL ROAD, KANNUR, KERALA, PIN -
670013
RESPONDENT:
NARAYANAN P.K, (EX.NK-13686867-W), AGED 59 YEARS, S/O. RAMUNNI
P.K(LATE) DSC RECORDS, KANNUR, RESIDING AT "PUTHALATHKUNNIMAL"),
PANTHALAYINI, QUILANDI P.O., KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673305
Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
pleased to stay the operation of Ext P2 order in OA 104/2022 dated
26.07.2022 of the Hon'ble Armed Forces Tribunal Regional Bench, Kochi,
pending disposal of the writ petition (civil).
This petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and
the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of
SRI. ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH, Advocates for the petitioners, M/S. HARISH
KUMAR B, THANAZ SADHIC Advocates for the respondent, the court passed the
following:
WP(C) No.15914/2024 2/4
AMIT RAWAL & EASWARAN.S, JJ.
-------------------------------------------------------
W.P(C)No.15914 of 2024
----------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2024
ORDER
Amit Rawal, J.
1. Inter alia alleges that similar controversy decided by
the Armed Forces Tribunal in O.A.No.19/2022 Balakrishnan
Mullikote v. Union of India and others decided on
26.07.2022 is under consideration before the Supreme Court
in Civil Appeal bearing No.27246/2023 and the matter is under
stay.
2. Issue notice before admission. Mr.Harishkumar,
learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice.
3. Mr.Harishkumar submits that decision rendered in
Balakrishnan Mullikote is totally different for, the said
employee had retired in 2008, probably the ground of the
Union of India is for delay in claiming the pension with regard
to the subsequent appointment in Defence Security Corps
(DSC). Even the factum of Regulation 44 of Pension
Regulations for the Army, 2008, and the defence letter had
also not been brought to the notice of the Supreme Court. Had
it been so there would not have been any delay. Be that as it
may. Since the matter is pending in Supreme Court, we do not
wish to decide the appeal on merits till its adjudication.
4. In this view of the matter, this case is adjourned to
05.11.2024 awaiting the decision in Civil Appeal
No.27246/2023.
In the meantime, there shall be stay of the judgment.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL JUDGE
Sd/-
EASWARAN.S JUDGE nak
22-05-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15914/2024 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN OA 104/2022 DATED 26.07.2022 OF THE HON'BLE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL REGIONAL BENCH, KOCHI
22-05-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!