Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sivakumar R vs Muthoot Capital Services Ltd
2024 Latest Caselaw 12890 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12890 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 May, 2024

Kerala High Court

Sivakumar R vs Muthoot Capital Services Ltd on 22 May, 2024

Author: P.Somarajan

Bench: P.Somarajan

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
     WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF MAY 2024 / 1ST JYAISHTA, 1946
                      CRL.REV.PET NO. 482 OF 2024
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.02.2024 IN CRA NO.128 OF 2023 OF
I   ADDITIONAL    DISTRICT   COURT,   ERNAKULAM   ARISING   OUT   OF   THE
JUDGMENT DATED 27.03.2023 IN CC NO.1176 OF 2019 OF ADDITIONAL
CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERNAKULAM
REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:

           SIVAKUMAR R, AGED 58 YEARS,
           S/o RAMAN, POOJAPARAMBIL HOUSE,
           KAJAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686507

           BY ADVS. ANOOP JOSEPH
                    ZERENE LINDA MITCHEL
                    ASWANI THUVVAKKADAN
                    LIYA JOSE
                    SURESH BABU V.C.


RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

      1     MUTHOOT CAPITAL SERVICES LTD,
            MUTHOOT TOWERS, M.G ROAD, ERNAKULAM,
            REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSOCIATE LEGAL AND AUTHORIZED
            PERSON AKHIL JOSHY, PIN - 682035

      2     STATE OF KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031

           BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI SANGEETHARAJ N R




THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
22.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.R.P.No.482 of 2024                   2




                                   ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing, the learned

counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that in

fact there is no sufficient reason to interfere with

the concurrent judgment of conviction rendered by both

the trial court and the first appellate court. The

sentence awarded also reflects a proper balance between

the mitigating and aggravating circumstances and no

commercial transaction is involved in the case in hand.

As such, there is no reason to admit the criminal

revision petition. But, four months time is granted to

the petitioner to receive the sentence ordered. Till

that time, no coercive steps shall be initiated against

the revision petitioner. The revision petitioner shall

appear before the trial court within that time to

receive the sentence.

Criminal Revision Petition will stand dismissed

accordingly with the abovesaid direction.

Sd/-

P.SOMARAJAN

JUDGE

DMR/-

APPENDIX OF CRL.REV.PET 482/2024

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.02.2024 IN CRL. APPEAL NO.128/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE IST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM

Annexure A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.03.2023 IN C.C. NO. 1176/2019 ON FILE OF THE ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE'S (MP/MLA'S) COURT, ERNAKULAM

// TRUE COPY //

P.A. TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter