Nisha vs The District Geologist
2024 Latest Caselaw 12784 Ker

Kerala High Court

Nisha vs The District Geologist on 21 May, 2024

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
        TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1946
                       WP(C) NO. 20958 OF 2016
PETITIONER:
           NISHA
           AGED 51 YEARS
           W/O ANISH LAL, AGED 31 YEARS, OLIPARAMBIL, MINALLUR
           P.O., MINALLUR VILLAGE, THALAPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR
           DISTRICT.

            BY ADV SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ


RESPONDENTS:
     1     THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST
           DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680
           001.
    2       THE DIRECTOR
            MINING AND GEOLOGYL OFFICE OF THE MINING AND GEOLOGY,
            KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
    3       THE STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIES
            DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT
            SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
    4       WADAKKANCHERRY MUNICIPALITY
            THRISSUR DISTRICT-680581 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

    5       THE SECRETARY
            WADAKKENCHERRY MUNICIPALITY, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680581.

            BY ADVS.
            SRI.MANSOOR.B.H.
            SMT.C.SEENA
            SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN
            SMT.P.B.WAHIDA


OTHER PRESENT:

            SRI.B.S.SYAMANTAK, GP


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P (C) No.20958 of 2016


                                2

                 P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN,J.
              ---------------------
                 W.P (C) No.20958 of 2016
           ---------------------------
             Dated this the 21st day of May, 2024

                           JUDGMENT

The counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that

the prayers in this writ petition are infructuous. Hence, this writ

petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE bng