Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12645 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 May, 2024
WP(C) No.11519/2024 1/4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
Tuesday, the 21st day of May 2024 / 31st Vaisakha, 1946
WP(C) NO. 11519 OF 2024(L)
PETITIONER:
ANUSREE S, AGED 29 YEARS, W/O. DEEKSHITH, HST(MATHS), PALORA HIGHER
SECONDARY SCHOOL, ULLIYERI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673323
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF
EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673001
2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL
OFFICER, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673573
Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to provisionally approve the
appointment of the petitioner as HST(Mathematics) in Palora Higher
Secondary School with effect from 21.10.2021 with all consequential
benefits, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
This petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and
the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of
M/S.R.K.MURALEEDHARAN, ATHIRA A.MENON, AJMAL AHMED R., HARISANKAR.K.V.
Advocates for the petitioner the court passed the following:
WP(C) No.11519/2024 2/4
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J.
---------------------
W.P.C No. 11519 of 2024
---------------------------
Dated this the 21st day of May, 2024
ORDER
The learned Government Pleader seeks further time to file
counter affidavit.
2. It is the specific case advanced by the learned counsel
for the petitioner is that, the main reason on which the approval of
appointment of the petitioner denied was that, the appointment
was made by the Manager, whose appointment is under challenge
before this Court. Yet another reason was that the petitioner was
not having K.TET qualification as on the date of occurrence of
vacancy.
3. However, it is discernible from Ext.P4 that she obtained
the said qualification on 20.10.2021. In such circumstances, I am
of the view that, an interim order can be passed in this case,
directing the 2nd respondent to provisionally approve the
appointment of the petitioner, in the scale of pay, with effect from
the date on which she acquired the qualification, namely
20.10.2021. While passing this order I have taken note of the
observation made by the Division Bench in Ext.P6 judgment, with
reference to the objection as to the failure of the management to
fill up the vacancies of physically handicapped persons. Orders
shall be passed in this regard within a period of one month from
today.
Sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE rpk
21-05-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11519/2024 Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF THE K.TET - III CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER DATED 16.12.2021 Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE JUDGMENT IN WA NO. 1445/2022 DATED 13.03.2023
21-05-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!