Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12384 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 30TH VAISAKHA, 1946
OP (RC) NO. 32 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 29.01.2024 IN I.A.NO.9/2023 IN
RCP NO.10 OF 2019 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT KOZHIKODE-I
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN RCP:
SURESH BABU
AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. UNICHOYI,
PROPRIETOR, SURESH ELECTRICALS, ROOM NO. PP 12/528,
ENGAPUZHA, THAMARASSERY RESIDING AT PANAMBODI CHALIL
HOUSE, RAROTH AMSOM, DESOM, THAMARASSERY TALUK,
THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673573
BY ADVS.
V.V.SURENDRAN
P.A.HARISH
DONA PAUL
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN RCP:
P.T. PAPPACHAN
AGED 74 YEARS, S/O. THOMAS,
POST KUPPAYATHODE, ENGAPUZHA AMSOM, PADOOR DESOM,
THAMARASSERY TALUK, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673573
BY ADV GEORGE SEBASTIAN
THIS OP (RENT CONTROL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP (RC) NO. 32 OF 2024
2
JUDGMENT
Amit Rawal, J.
1. This petition is directed at the instance of the
petitioner-tenant against the order dated 29.01.2024 passed in
I.A.No.9/2023 in Rent Control Petition No.10/2019 whereby the
eviction of the petitioner-tenant at the instance of the respondent
- landlord has been sought on the ground of personal necessity,
for diminishing the value and utility of the building as well as the
arrears of rent. Once the pleadings in the aforementioned rent
petitions were over petitioner - tenant acquired knowledge of
subsequent event that the respondent-landlord had, during the
pendency of the eviction petition, leased out two portions of the
same very building to another three tenants and thus, as per the
first proviso to sub-section 3 of section 11, the petition is liable
to be dismissed. In order to invoke those provisions assistance of
the Court was sought by submitting I.A.No.9/2023 calling upon
the tenant to produce the alleged lease deeds which are
unregistered. Landlord denied the existence of those documents.
It is in that background, petitioner was left with no other choice
but to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court. OP (RC) NO. 32 OF 2024
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and appraised the paper book and of the view that once the
landlord though has not denied the existence of lease deed
specifically but stated that there was no need of production of
the document, the petitioner-tenant would be at liberty to take
the advantage of the provisions of section 118(g) of the Indian
Evidence Act by drawing the adverse inference and prove the
same at the relevant point of time when the stage for leading his
evidence begins. Thus the observation of the Rent Controller that
the application could not have been made is wholly absurd and
not sustainable.
With the aforementioned observations, the revision petition
stands disposed off.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL JUDGE
Sd/-
EASWARAN S. JUDGE nak OP (RC) NO. 32 OF 2024
APPENDIX OF OP (RC) 32/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF RCP. NO. 10/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE RENT CONTROLLER/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF- 1, KOZHIKODE, DATED 18.01.2019
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT DATED 21.05.2019 IN RCP. NO. 10/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE RENT CONTROLLER/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF- 1, KOZHIKODE
Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION FILED IN SUPPORT OF I.A. 09/2023 IN R.C.P. 10/2019 DATED 21.09.2023 ON THE FILE OF THE RENT CONTROLLER/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF-1, KOZHIKODE
Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT DATED 26.09.2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN I.A. 9/2023 IN RCP 10/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE RENT CONTROLLER/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF- 1, KOZHIKODE
Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.01.2024 IN I.A. 9/2023 IN RCP 10/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE RENT CONTROLLER/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF- 1, KOZHIKODE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!