Friday, 05, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Muneer vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 19029 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19029 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Muneer vs State Of Kerala on 28 June, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
        FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1946
                       CRL.MC NO. 5060 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.562 OF 2023 OF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS , MANANTHAVADY
PETITIONERS:

    1      MUNEER
           AGED 25 YEARS
           S/O MUHAMMED,
           MUNDANADU PEEDIKAYIL HOUSE,
           PANAMARAM P.O,
           KARIMPUMMAL,
           WAYANAAD,,
           PIN - 670721
    2      AFSEER
           AGED 26 YEARS
           S/O ASHRAF,
           KOTTAKADAN HOUSE,
           PANAMARAM P.O,
           KARIMPUMMAL,
           WAYANAND,,
           PIN - 670721
           BY ADVS.
           T.P.PRADEEP
           P.K.SATHEES KUMAR
           R.K.PRASANTH
           MINIKUMARY M.V.
           JIJO JOSEPH


RESPONDENTS:

    1      STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
           HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
           ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
    2      SHAKKIR
           S/O SHAHAD, 28 YEARS,
           PULIYADI HOUSE,
           KANIYAMABETTA P.O,
           WAYANAD DISTRICT,,
           PIN - 673122
    3      SHAHIR
           AGED 29 YEARS
 CRL.MC NO. 5060 OF 2024
                                 2

         S/O ABDUL KHADER,
         VATTAPARAMBIL HOUSE,
         PANAMARAM P.O,
         CHANGADAKADAVU,
         WAYANAD DISTRICT,,
         PIN - 670721
    4    FAISAL
         AGED 36 YEARS
         S/O USMAN,
         KALLACHI HOUSE,
         CHERUKATTOOR P.O,
         ARAMUTTAMKUNNU,
         PANAMARAM, WAYANAD,,
         PIN - 670721
OTHER PRESENT:

         SREEJA V (PP)


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
28.06.2024,   THE   COURT   ON       THE   SAME   DAY   PASSED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 5060 OF 2024
                                     3

                   BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                    -----------------------------------------
                      Crl.M.C. No. 5060 of 2024
                    ----------------------------------------
                Dated this the 28th day of June, 2024


                                 ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482

of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash all proceedings

against them.

2. Petitioners are accused in C.C. No.562 of 2023 on the files

of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Mananthavady,

registered for the offences under Sections 294(b), 324 and 341

r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Respondents 2 to

4 are the defacto complainant and the injured witnesses.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on

21-08-2017 restrained the defacto complainant and the injured

and assaulted them and also abused them and thereby committed

the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the

learned counsel for the respondents, apart from the learned

Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the CRL.MC NO. 5060 OF 2024

matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the

petitioners ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that,

considering the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be

served by continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10

SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the

High Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes

between the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the

criminal proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh

and Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466]

and Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and

Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure A3 to Annexure A5 affidavits

filed by respondents 2 to 4. The learned Public Prosecutor has

submitted that upon verification, it is understood that the

affidavits are genuine, and the defacto complainant and the other

deponents stand by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the

matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this

case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing.

The continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in

futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in CRL.MC NO. 5060 OF 2024

C.C. No.562 of 2023 on the files of the Judicial First Class

Magistrate's Court, Mananthavady are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJM CRL.MC NO. 5060 OF 2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN FILED IN CC 383/17 SPITTED AND RENUMBERED AS CC 562/2023 ON THE FILES OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, MANATHAVADY, WAYANAD DISTRICT DATED 28/08/2017 Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CC 383/17 ON THE FILES OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, MANATHAVADY, WAYANAD DISTRICT DATED 16/09/2023 Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT DATED 25/05/2024 Annexure A4 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3/INJURED DATED 25/05/2024 Annexure A5 A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY RESPONDENT NO.4/INJURED DATED 25/05/2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter