Friday, 05, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Elsan Abraham vs Salin Varghese
2024 Latest Caselaw 19021 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19021 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Elsan Abraham vs Salin Varghese on 28 June, 2024

Author: Raja Vijayaraghavan

Bench: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                        PRESENT
   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
                           &
         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ
 FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1946

                 OP (FC) NO. 276 OF 2024

AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 03.04.2024 IN R.P NO. 19/2023
     IN OP NO.1052/2018 OF FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM

PETITIONER/PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:

          ELSAN ABRAHAM
          AGED 49 YEARS
          D/O.ABRAHAM, KOLAKKOZHIMAKKAL
          HOUSE, MANARCADU (PO), KOTTAYAM
          DISTRICT, PIN - 686019

          BY ADVS.
          BINOY VASUDEVAN
          SREEJITH SREENATH


RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:

          SALIN VARGHESE
          S/O.BABY, AGED 48 YEARS, AYKKARAPADAVIL
          HOUSE, SOUTH PAMBADI (PO), KOTTAYAM
          DISTRICT, PIN - 686521

          BY ADVS.
          SANTHOSH PETER
          P.N.ANOOP(K/1451/2003)
          M.S.SANDEEP SUDHAKARAN(K/000598/2018)


OTHER PRESENT:

          SRI SANTHOSH PETER(MAMALAYIL), FOR PARTY RESP.

THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR FINAL
HEARING ON 28.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                         2
O.P (FC) No. 276 of 2024




                                  JUDGMENT

Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.

This petition is filed challenging the order dated 03.04.2024 in R.P

No. 19 of 2023 in O.P No.1052 of 2018, passed by the Family Court,

Kottayam at Ettumannor.

2. It appears that, by the said application, the request made by

the petitioner herein, for setting aside the ex parte decree, was allowed

on payment of cost of Rs.20,000/-.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits

that the petitioner is a lady and that she is facing an acute financial crisis.

According to the learned counsel, there were no wilful laches on her part

and the cost ordered is on the higher side.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent would

refute the submissions. He points out that the petitioner had appeared in

the proceedings as early as on 31.12.2018 and it was after the grant of

numerous opportunities that the case was posted for evidence. It is

submitted that though numerous postings were granted, she did not

appear and she was set ex parte on 9.12.2021. The evidence was

recorded on 19.9.2022 and the case was posted for judgment on

27.09.2022. The Court by order dated 08.11.2022 had allowed the

application on payment of cost of Rs.15,000/-. However, for non-payment

of cost, the application was dismissed on 24.12.2022. It is thereafter, that

on 06.02.2023, a fresh application was filed, which was allowed on

payment of cost of Rs.20,000/-. According to the learned counsel, no

interference is warranted.

5. We have considered the submissions advanced.

6. We find that the petitioner is a lady, who is defending a

petition for divorce. Though there are laches on her part, we are of the

view that an opportunity is to be granted to contest the matter on merits.

However, we are of the view that the cost of Rs.20,000/-, ordered by the

Family Court is on the higher side. Having considered all the relevant

facts, we sustain the order passed by the Family Court, but reduce the

cost ordered to Rs.15,000/-. We direct the petitioner to pay the cost as

modified within a period of two weeks from today. If the amount is paid

as ordered, the petition shall be taken back on file and the proceedings

shall be expedited and concluded at the earliest, as the petition is of the

year 2015. Needless to say, the petitioner shall diligently cooperate to

take the matter to a logical conclusion at the earliest.

This Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE

Sd/-

P.M.MANOJ, JUDGE

APM

APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 276/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF O.P.NO.1052/2018 DATED NIL. ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM AT ETTUMANOOR

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF I.A.NO.2/2022 IN O.P.NO.1052/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM AT ETTUMANOOR

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF R.P.NO.19/2023 IN O.P.NO.1052/2018 DATED 16-02-2023 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM AT ETTUMANNOR

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION PREFERRED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED NIL IN R.P.NO.19/2023 IN O.P.NO.1052/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM AT ETTUMANNOR

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 03-04-2024 IN R.P.NO.19/2023 IN O.P.NO.1052/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM AT ETTUMANOOR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter