Friday, 05, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Worldecor vs The Authorized Officer
2024 Latest Caselaw 18983 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18983 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

M/S Worldecor vs The Authorized Officer on 28 June, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                          PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
 FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1946
                WP(C) NO. 28917 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

         M/S WORLDECOR
         DOOR NO.11/640, J, KARIMBULLY,
         MARUTHUR P.O, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD
         REP.BY MANAGING PARTNER,
         MOHAMMED BASHEER CT, AGED 41 YEARS,
         S/O KUNJIMUHAMMEDCT, CHETTIYARTHODI HOUSE,
         KURUVATTOOR, VALLAPUZHA,
         PALAKKAD, PIN - 679306.

         BY ADVS.
         PRAVEEN K. JOY
         N.ABHILASH


RESPONDENTS:

   1     THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER
         DHANLAXMI BANK PATTAMBI BRANCH
         DOOR NO.5/1672, FIRST FLOOR YEMKAY TRADE
         CENTER, MAIN ROAD, PATTAMBI - 679303.

   2     BRANCH MANAGER
         DHANLAXMI BANK PATTAMBI BRANCH
         DOOR NO.5/1672, FIRST FLOOR YEMKAY TRADE
         CENTER, MAIN ROAD, PATTAMBI - 679303.

   3     COMMITTEE FOR STRESSED MSME (MICRO,
         SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES)
         DHANLAXMI BANK DHANLAXMI BANK HEAD OFFICE
         DHANLAXMI BUILDINGS, NAIKKANAL
         THRISSUR, PIN - 680022.

   4     DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE
         GOVERNMENT OF KERALA VIKAS BHAVAN. P.O
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033.
 W.P.(C)No.28917 of 2022
                           :2:


    5    MSME CREDIT MONITORING CELL
         OFFICE OF THE DC (MSME) ROOM NO.734 B,
         7TH FLOOR A-WING, NIRMAN BHAVAN,
         MAULANA AZAD ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110108.

         BY ADVS.
         SRI.BINOY DAVIS, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
         SRI.T.C.KRISHNA, SCGC
         SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 28.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C)No.28917 of 2022
                              :3:




                       JUDGMENT

Dated this the 28th day of June, 2024

The petitioner, a Partnership Firm running in the name

and style M/s.Worldecor, has approached this Court when the

respondents have initiated coercive proceedings invoking the

provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of

Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,

2002.

2. In this writ petition, the petitioner prayed that the

respondents be directed to take up Ext.P6 statutory

application and formulate a committee and to keep in

abeyance further proceedings against the petitioner till Ext.P6

is considered and a decision is taken.

3. The petitioner has relied upon the revival and

rehabilitation framework of MSME institutions for seeking

reliefs.

4. Standing Counsel entered appearance and resisted

the writ petition. The Standing Counsel submitted that the

petitioner was granted a Cash Credit Facility of ₹2.5 Crores in

the year 2016 and the outstanding amount has accumulated to

₹4,19,09,509/- as on 24.06.2024. The petitioner is inter alia

seeking to settle the loan account by One Time Settlement. If

the petitioner remits an amount of ₹1 Crore, then the

application for settlement of loan account can be considered.

5. The petitioner, on the other hand, would submit that

the normal upfront payment is 10% of the settlement amount

and the petitioner may not be subjected to harsh conditions.

6. Taking into consideration the entire facts of the

case and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner

has remitted an amount of ₹10 lakhs pursuant to the interim

direction of this Court, I am of the view that the petitioner's

application for One Time Settlement can be considered as per

rules of the respondents.

The writ petition is disposed of directing that if the

petitioner makes application for One Time Settlement, paying

the upfront payment as per the rules of the Bank within a

period of two weeks, the same shall be considered in

accordance with law by the respondents. If the petitioner

makes an application and remits requisite upfront payment as

directed above, coercive proceedings against the petitioner

shall stand deferred till the Bank takes a decision on the One

Time Settlement Application.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE ams

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 28917/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE UDHYAM REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE WITH REGISTRATION NUMBER KL-10-0005877 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF E-

MAIL ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK TO THE PETITIONER DATED 01.08.2022 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 10.02.2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT BANK DATED 26.08.2022 Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGE OF THE ORDER DATED 17.03.2016 OF RBI/2015- 16/338 OF CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER OF RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Exhibit P6 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 26.08.2022

RESPONDENT ANNEXURES Annexure R2 (a) A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 30.03.2021 Annexure R2 (b) A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 16.04.202

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter