Friday, 05, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shareefa vs Abdul Jabbar
2024 Latest Caselaw 18610 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18610 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Shareefa vs Abdul Jabbar on 27 June, 2024

Author: Amit Rawal

Bench: Amit Rawal

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                           PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
                              &
            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
   THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE    2024 / 6TH ASHADHA, 1946
                      RP NO. 611 OF 2024
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.5.2024 IN OP (RC) NO.28 OF 2024
                   OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT IN OP(RC)/PETITIONER IN RCP ::
         ANEES BABU @ HANEES BABU AGED 48 YEARS
         S/O. CHALIL CHALAKKANDI MOOSA,, IRUMPUZHI POST,
         MALAPPURAM REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER,
         CHALIL CHALAKANDI MOOSA, AGED 71, S/O. CHALIL
         CHALAKNDI MUHAMMED, IRUMBUZHI POST,
         MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676509
         BY ADV E.C.AHAMED FAZIL
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER IN OP(RC)/RESPONDENT IN RCP :
         ABDUL JABBAR AGED 58 YEARS
         S/O. PUZHAKKARA ILLATH MUHAMMED KUNHI,
         KAIPAMANGALAM POST, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
         PIN - 680681




     THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 27.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 R.P. Nos.611, 614 & 615 of 2024
                                  2




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                             PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
                                  &
            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
   THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE      2024 / 6TH ASHADHA, 1946
                       RP NO. 614 OF 2024
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.5.2024 IN OP (RC) NO.30 OF 2024
                   OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT IN OP(RC)/PETITIONER IN RCP :
         SHAREEFA AGED 49 YEARS
         D/O. CHALIL CHALAKKANDI MOOSA,
         IRUMPUZHI POST, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676509


         BY ADV E.C.AHAMED FAZIL


RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER IN OP(RC) AND RESPONDENT IN RCP :
         ABDUL JABBAR AGED 58 YEARS
         S/O. PUZHAKKARA ILLATH MUHAMMED KUNHI,
         KAIPAMANGALAM POST, KODUNGALLUR,
         THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680681




     THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 27.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
   R.P. Nos.611, 614 & 615 of 2024
                                    3



             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
                                    &
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
    THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE       2024 / 6TH ASHADHA, 1946
                         RP NO. 615 OF 2024
   AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.5.2024 IN OP (RC) NO.27 OF
                  2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA


REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT IN OP(RC)/PETITIONER IN RCP :
           CHALIL CHALAKKANDI MOOSA AGED 71 YEARS
           S/O. CHALIL CHALAKKANDI MUHAMMED,
           IRUMPUZHI POST, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
           PIN - 676509


           BY ADV E.C.AHAMED FAZIL


 RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT IN OP(RC)/RESPONDENT IN RCP:
           ABDUL JABBAR AGED 58 YEARS
           S/O. PUZHAKKARA ILLATH MUHAMMED KUNHI,
           KAIPAMANGALAM POST, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR,
           PIN - 680681


      THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
 27.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
 FOLLOWING:
 R.P. Nos.611, 614 & 615 of 2024
                                  4



                                ORDER

AMIT RAWAL, J.

These Review Petitions have been filed stating that there is

an error apparent on the judgment on the ground of reference of

the document Ext.P10, whereas it should have been Ext.P2 and

that the landlord never admitted the rate of rent as Rs.1,10,000/-

instead it was Rs.1,31,250/-.

2. We have perused the files and the order of the rent

controller and of the view that error apparent is only to the limited

extent that instead of Ext.P10, it should have been Ext.P2.

Reference of Ext.P10 is corrected as Ext.P2. However, our findings

are in respect of the findings rendered by the rent controller in

paragraph 11 of the order.

These review petitions with the aforementioned modification

stand disposed of.

Sd/-

AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE

Sd/-

NS                                      EASWARAN S., JUDGE
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter