Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15876 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 11119 OF 2016
PETITIONER:
SAJEEV.A.G
S/O.GOPINATHAN NAIR, AGED 37, ALACKAL HOUSE,
PLASSANAL P.O.,PLASSANAL,ERATTUPETTA, KOTTAYAM
DISTRICT-686 579.
BY ADV. SRI.GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
INDUSTRIES(A), GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2 THE DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF MINING & GEOLOGY, PATTOM PALACE
P.O.,KESAVADASAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.
3 THE GOLOGIST
MINING & GEOLOGY,DISTRICT OFFICE, CIVIL
STATION,KOTTAYAM-686 002.
4 THE CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD, KOCHI-682 028.
5 THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
KERALA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,DISTRICT OFFICE,
KOTTAYAM-686 002.
6 THE THIDANADU GRAMA PANCHAYAT
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, THIDANADU
P.O.,KOTTAYAM-686 123.
7 M/S.MARIA GRANITES
MALLIKASSERY P.O.,PAIKA,PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-
686 577. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER,
M.JOHN JACOB.
W.P.(C) No.11119 of 2016
2
BY ADVS.
SRI. T.NAVEEN SC, KERALA STATE POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD,
SRI.SREELAL N.WARRIER
SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY - R7
SRI.RIYAL DEVASSY, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 06.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.11119 of 2016
3
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
------------------------------
W.P.(C)No. 11119 of 2016
----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 06th day of June, 2024
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following
reliefs:
"a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the 6th respondent not to renew Exhibit P3 licence to the 7th respondent in respect of his quarrying operations for the coming financial year;
b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to respondents 1 to 5 not to issue licence to the 7 th respondent for the financial year 2016-17.
c) Pass such other writ, order or direction as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and in the facts and circumstances of the case."[SIC]
2. When this Writ petition came up for
consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the
7th respondent submitted that the prayers in this
Writ petition are infructuous. There is no
representation for the petitioner also. Therefore,
this Writ petition need not be retained here.
Accordingly, this Writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE DM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!