Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shan Das vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 15745 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15745 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Shan Das vs State Of Kerala on 6 June, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
     THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                        OP(CRL.) NO. 420 OF 2024
   CRIME NO.816/2016 OF Palarivattom Police Station, Ernakulam
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.2108 OF 2016 OF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - IX, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER:

            SHAN DAS
            AGED 38 YEARS
            S/O. MOHAN DAS,
            PODIMANNIL HOUSE,
            KOODAL P.O., ADOOR,
            PATHANAMTHITTA,
            PIN - 689693
            BY ADVS.
            T.KABIL CHANDRAN
            R.ANJALI


RESPONDENT:

            STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
            PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION
            THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
            PIN - 682031
OTHER PRESENT:

            SREEJA V. (PP)


     THIS     OP   (CRIMINAL)   HAVING      COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
06.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 OP(CRL.) NO. 420 OF 2024
                               2

                BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
             ..........................................................
                 O.P.(Crl) No. 420 of 2024
             ..........................................................
             Dated this the 6th day of June, 2024

                           JUDGMENT

Petitioner is the 2nd accused in C.C.No. 2108/2016 on

the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-IX,

Ernakulam. He faces prosecution along with other accused for

the offences under Sections 341, 353 r/w Section 34 of the

Indian Penal Code, 1860 apart from the offence under Section

3(ii) of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.

2. When the case was posted for evidence on

15-11-2021, the counsel for the accused sought for an

adjournment and on their request, the case was posted to

24-11-2021 on which date also the accused failed to appear in

Court and again sought for an adjournment. The reason for

the adjournment being not convincing, the learned Magistrate

dismissed the said application and proceeded with the trial.

3. In the meantime, an application was filed in 2024

under Section 311 Cr.P.C to cross-examine PW-1 and PW-2. OP(CRL.) NO. 420 OF 2024

The said application was dismissed by the impugned order

dated 03-05-2024, as being belated and an attempt to review

the earlier order rejecting the request for adjournment of the

case for cross-examination. Petitioner challenges the aforesaid

order rejecting his application under Section 311 Cr.P.C.,

4. I have heard Sri. T.Kabil Chandaran, the learned

counsel for the petitioner as well as Smt.Sreeja the learned

Public Prosecutor.

5. Petitioner is facing prosecution for the offences under

Section 353, 341 r/w Section 34 of the IPC along with the

other accused. Concededly, the evidence for the prosecution

has not yet been completed and petitioner has participated in

the trial and even cross-examined the remaining witnesses

examined on behalf of the prosecution. Admittedly, two of the

prosecution witnesses PW1 and PW2 were not cross-examined

on behalf of the petitioner. The case had been dragging from

2021 till date, despite the petitioner's failure to cross-examine

the prosecution witnesses. Since interests of justice require

that the accused be given an opportunity to cross examine the

witnesses, I am of the view that, though the learned OP(CRL.) NO. 420 OF 2024

Magistrate was justified in observing that the application was

belated one last opportunity must be granted to the petitioner

to cross-examine the witnesses and the impugned order be set

aside.

6. Accordingly, Ext.P5 order dated 03-05-2024 in

C.M.P.No.2267.2024 in C.C.No.2108/2016 on the files of the

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-IX, Ernakulam is set

aside. The learned Magistrate shall recall PW-1 and PW2 and

permit the petitioner to cross-examine them. Petitioner shall

not seek, under any circumstances whatsoever, any further

adjournment for cross-examination. If in case the petitioner

fails to cross-examine the witnesses on the day prescribed by

the Court, the learned Magistrate will be at liberty to proceed

in accordance with law.

This original petition is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJM OP(CRL.) NO. 420 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF OP(CRL.) 420/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR AND FINAL REPORT IN CC NO. 2108/2016 PENDING ON THE FILES OF JUDICIAL FIRST-CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-IX, ERNAKULAM Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 24.11.2021 IN CMP NO.2465/2021 IN CC NO. 2108/2016 PENDING ON THE FILES OF JUDICIAL FIRST-CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT- IX, ERNAKULAM Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEPOSITION OF PW1 Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN CMP 2267/2024 IN CC NO. 2108/2016 PENDING ON THE FILES OF JUDICIAL FIRST-CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-IX, ERNAKULAM Exhibit P5 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 03.05.2024 IN CMP 2267/2024 IN CC NO. 2108/2016 PENDING ON THE FILES OF JUDICIAL FIRST-CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT- IX, ERNAKULAM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter