Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Union Of India vs G.Thankachan
2024 Latest Caselaw 15278 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15278 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Union Of India vs G.Thankachan on 5 June, 2024

Author: Amit Rawal

Bench: Amit Rawal

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
                                  &
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
     WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1946
                      OP (CAT) NO. 208 OF 2017

AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.03.2016 IN OA NO.326 OF 2015 OF CENTRAL
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH
PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3:
     1     UNION OF INDIA
           REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE,
           SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110 001.

    2     GENERAL MANAGER
          ORDNANCE FACTORY, CHANDA, CHANDRAPUR 442501,
          MAHARASHTRA STATE.

    3     PRINCIPAL CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS PENSIONS
          DRAUPADI GHAT, ALLAHABAD 211 014.

          BY ADVS.
          ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
          SRI.T.V.VINU, CGC



RESPONDENT/APPLICANT & 4TH RESPONDENT:
     1     G.THANKACHAN
           S/O. LATE D.GEORGE, AGED 63 YEARS, CHARGEMAN [RETD],
           ORDANANCE FACTORY, VALIYAVILA HOUSE, PERUMANOOR P.O,
           VIA VALAKOM, KOLLAM DISTRICT, 691 532.

    2     THE CHIEF MANAGER
          STATE BANK OF INDIA, CENTRAL PENSION PROCESSING CENTRE,
          GANAPATHY KOVIL ROAD, VAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
          695 014.

          BY ADVS.
          SMT.CHANDINI G.NAIR
          SRI.C.S.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR


     THIS OP (CAT) HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 05.06.2024, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 OP (CAT) NO. 208 OF 2017
                                  2

                               JUDGMENT

Amit Rawal, J.

1. Present petition has been filed on behalf of Union of India

against the judgment of the Administrative Tribunal whereby the

respondent-applicant had challenged the action of the petitioners

taken in the decision dated 18.9.2014.

2. Respondent-applicant was appointed as a Junior

Examiner. Later, was granted promotion as Examiner Grade -II,

Examiner HS-II (highly skilled), Examiner MCM (master craftsman)

and Chargeman (Tech/Mech), before his retirement on 31.10.2011.

On promotion, was granted a Grade pay of Rs.4600/-, which was

without noticing the movement from HS-II to MCM as the

entitlement of grade pay to such employee was 4200. Before

retirement, the pension papers were authorized with effect from

29.8.2011.

3. The communication Ext.R2 dated 30.3.2010 envisage that

the revision would be subject to receipt of order and clarification

from the Government. On inter correspondence between the

department and the office of the Principal Controller of Accounts

(Fys) dated 31.7.2013, informed the petitioners' concerned

department that the entitlement of grade to the respondent- OP (CAT) NO. 208 OF 2017

applicant was Rs.4200/-. Before taking action, put to notice dated

30.11.2013 culminated into impugned order dated 18.9.2014.

4. Learned Tribunal by relying upon the provisions of Rule

70 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, passed verdict in favour of the

respondent-applicant that the recovery was beyond the period of

two years.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the

recovery was much before the two years as the pension paper were

finalized on 29.8.2011 and the decision was taken on 31.7.2013,

followed by show cause notice and the impugned communication,

thus there cannot be any bar of limitation. No doubt, the recovery

could not have been made in view of the ratio decidendi culled out

in State of Punjab and others v. Rafiq Masih (White Washer) ( AIR

2015 SC 696). But recovery of few months has already been

effected and the remaining recovery will not be effected but the

department cannot be prevented from restructuring the pension.

6. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent-

applicant submitted that the action of the respondent for recovery

was wholly beyond the limitation as the petitioners have given

notice for the first time in September 2014, which is beyond two

years.

OP (CAT) NO. 208 OF 2017

7. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and

appraised the paper book. It is axiomatic to extract the order

granting the revision of pay to the respondent dated 30.3.2010 and

also decision of the Principal Controller of Accounts dated

31.7.2013.

Order dated 30.3.2010: In accordance with the directives contained in Ministry of Personnel, DOP&T OM No.35034/3/2008/Fat (1) dated 19.5.2009, received under OFB Instruction No. 43/2009/(PCC) dt. 26.6.2009 and clarification received under OFD Instruction No. 55/2009/ (PCC) Dt. 14.10.2009 and Instruction No. 58/2009/ (PCC) dated 18.11.2009 second and third financial upgradation under Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPs) is hereby granted to the following individuals based on the recommendation of Departmental Screening Committee on completion of 20 & 30 years of regular service:

1. xxx

2. xxx

3. xxx

55. PER No, Name Desgn - G.Thankachan, CM.Gr-II/T Entry Grade & Date -Un Skilled, 2.7.1973 Date and Present Pay scale - 23.3.2006 - 4200 10 years/20 years/30 years - 3rd GP Rs. 4600/-

Date of Grant of Upgradation - 1.9.2008

On grant of Financial Upgradation under the scheme, there shall be no change in the designation, classification or higher status. Financial Upgradation under the MACPs shall be purely personal to the employees and shall have no relevance to his seniority position. As such there shall be no additional Financial Upgradation for the senior employees on the ground that the junior employees in the grade has got higher pay/grade pay under the MACPS. OP (CAT) NO. 208 OF 2017

"The pay of the employees shall be raised by 3% of total pay in the pay band and grade pay drawn before upgradation. The above individuals G.Thank may exercise option under FR 22 (1)(a)(i) for fixation of pay within one month from the date of publication of order. "

However the above would be subject to revision on receipt of any Govt. Order/ clarification having bearing in the matter."

Order dated 31.7.2013: In continuation to this office earlier circular bearing No. Pay/Tech-11/04/2013/17/Cir dated 03.06.2013, it is intimated that the matter regarding grant of 3rd MACP benefit in the same grade pay of Rs. 4200/- to the MCMs in the light of MoD ID no. 11(5)/2009- D(Civ-1) dated 23.07.2012 has been examined by this office. Accordingly it has been decided that the said benefit may be extended to all eligible MCMs (either in service or going to retire) along with 3% incremental benefit on Band Pay and Gr Pay of Rs.4200/-. In this connection it is also mentioned that in cases where such benefit has already been given in the Gr. Pay of Rs. 4600 only the grade Pay may be restricted /reduced to Rs. 4200-/

8. The aforementioned has to be read in conjunction with

the Rule 70 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 by the Central

Administrative Tribunal but for the sake of repetition, the same is

extracted hereunder:

"70. Revision of pension after authorization (1)Subject to the provisions of Rules 8 and 9 pension once authorized after final assessment shall not be revised to the disadvantage of the Government servant, unless such revision becomes necessary on account of detection of a clerical error subsequently:

Provided that no revision of pension to the disadvantage of the pensioner shall be ordered by the Head of Office without the concurrence of the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms if the clerical error is detected after a period of two years from the date of authorization of pension.

OP (CAT) NO. 208 OF 2017

[(1-A) The question whether the revision has become necessary on account of a clerical error or not shall be decided by the administrative Ministry or Department.] (2) For the purpose of sub-rule (1), the retired Government servant concerned shall be served with a notice by the Head of Office requiring him to refund the excess payment of pension within a period of two months from the date of receipt of notice by him. (3) In case the Government servant fails to comply with the notice, the Head of Office shall, by order in writing, direct that such excess payment, shall be adjusted in instalments by short payments of pension in future, in one or more instalments, as the Head of Office may direct.

9. Concededly, the pension was finalized on 29.8.2011. The

decision dated 31.7.2013 is within two years. We are in agreement

with the contention of the respondent-applicant as well as the

findings of the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding the

recovery of the excess amount in view of the ratio of decidendi

culled out in Rafiq Masih (supra). Whatever the recovery has

already been made, will not be refunded back to the applicant but

the petitioners are restrained from making any further recovery.

But the order of the CAT cannot be construed in refraining the

petitioners/department from restructuring the pension as

concededly, the grade pay to the respondent-applicant as per the

portfolio held by him was to be accorded as Rs.4200 and not

Rs.4600. No contrary documents has been shown entitlement of

grade pay of Rs. 4600.

Thus the order of the CAT to this extent is modified. OP (CAT) NO. 208 OF 2017

Petitioners are at liberty to restructure the pension in view of the

change in the grade pay.

Sd/-

AMIT RAWAL JUDGE

Sd/-

sab                                        EASWARAN S.
                                              JUDGE
 OP (CAT) NO. 208 OF 2017


                 APPENDIX OF OP (CAT) 208/2017

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A4            TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO-B/G/ PAY 2314
                       DATED   30.11.2013 ISSUED  BY   THE  2ND
                       RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A5            TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO-B/G/ PAY 2314
                       DATED   4-12-2014 ISSUED   BY   THE  2ND
                       RESPONDENT

ANNEXURE A7            TRUE    COPY     OF    THE     CORRG.PPO.NO
                       C/CORR/FYS/15747/2014    DATED    18-9-2014
                       ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT

ANNEXURE A10           TRUE    COPY    OF    THE    LETTER       NO-

CPPC/HA/5047/373 DATED 6-12-2014.

ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF REVISED PAY FIXATION ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE LAST PAY CERTIFICATE ISSUED ON 1-11-2011.

ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE PPO NO-C/FYS/18854/2011.

ANNEXURE A6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO-PAY/TECH-

II/04/2014/02 DATED 11.2.2014.

ANNEXURE A8 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO-2456/PC/GT DATED 9-11-2014.

ANNEXURE A9 TRUE COPY OF THE SLIP ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

ANNEXURE A11 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22.12.2014.

ANNEXURE A12 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO-BG/PAY 2314/DATED 17.1.2015.

ANNEXURE A13 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO-

CPPC/5047/373/SR DATED 5.2.2015.

 OP (CAT) NO. 208 OF 2017




ANNEXURE R1         TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO-01/CR/A/I/658
                    DATED     13.12.2010    REGARDING  CADRE
                    RESTRUCTURING OF ARTISAN CADRE

ANNEXURE R2         TRUE COPY OF THE FACTORY ORDER PART II NO-

1193 DATED 30.3.2010 REGARDING GRANT OF MACP-III TO THE APPLICANT

ANNEXURE R3 TRUE COPY OF THE FACTORY ORDER PART II NO-

3054 DATED 21.8.2010 REGARDING FIXATION OF PAY ON GRANTING MACP-III

ANNEXURE R4 TRUE COPY OF PCA(FYS)LETTER NO-PAY/TECH-

II/04/2011//15 DATED 26/8/2011 REGARDING FIXATION OF PAY UNDER CADRE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTISAN STAFF

ANNEXURE R5 TRUE COPY OF OFB LETTER NO-

01/CR/VOL.II/A/I 658 DATED 12.9.2011

ANNEXURE R6 TRUE COPY OF OFB LETTER NO-

01/CR/IL.II/A/1/658 DATED 25.1.2011 REGARDING ISSUE OF CLARIFICATION

ANNEXURE R7 TRUE COPY OF MOD ID NO-11(5)/2009-D(CIV.I) DATED 2307.2012 CLARIFYING THE ELIGIBILITY OF MCM FOR GRADE PAY OF RS.4,200/-

ANNEXURE R8 TRUE COPY OF PCFA KOLKATTA LETTER NO-

PAY/TECH-II/04/2012/20 DATED 8-10-2012 TO REDUCE GRADE PAY TO RS.4200/- AND MAKE RECOVERIES

ANNEXURE R9 TRUE COPY OF AO/OFCH LETTER NO-

L/534/GEN.CORR DATED 1.11.2012 REGARDING REDUCTION OF GRADE PAY TO RS.4200/-AND CONSEQUENT RECOVERY

ANNEXURE R10 TRUE COPY OF O.F.CHANDA LETTER NO-

2522/MACP/LB DATED 21.11.2012

ANNEXURE R11 TRUE COPY OF PCFA KOLKATA LETTER NO-

PAY/TECH-II 04/2013/01 DATED 1.1.2013 OP (CAT) NO. 208 OF 2017

ANNEXURE R12 TRUE COPY OF CHANDA LETTER NO-2522/MACP/LB DATED 23.2.2013

ANNEXURE R13 TRUE COPY OF LAO/OFCH LETTER NO-L/GEN.CORR DATED 6.3.2013

ANNEXURE R14 TRUE COPY OF PCA (FYS) KOLKATTA LETTER NO-

PAY/TECH -II/04/201/17 CIR DATED 3.6.2013

ANNEXURE R15 TRUE COPY OF PCFA KOLKATTA LETTER NO-

PAY/TECH-II 04/2013/22 DATED 31.7.2013

ANNEXURE R16 TRUE COPY OF CHANDA LETTER NO-2522/MACP/LB DATED 24.9.2013

ANNEXURE R17 TRUE COPY OF PCA (FYS)LETTER NO-PAY/TECH-

II/2014/02 DATED 11.2.2014

ANNEXURE R18 TRUE COPY OF MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ID NO-

11(5) 2009-(CIV-1) DATED 6-2-2014

ANNEXURE R-19 TRUE COPY OF OFB LETTER NO-1/CR/A/I/658 DATED 17.2.2014

ANNEXURE R-20 TRUE COPY OF CH F.O.PART-II NO-3437 DATED 5-9-2014 WITHDRAWING GP OF RS.4600/-

ANNEXURE R21 TRUE COPY OF O.F.CHANDA LETTER NO-

BG/VETAN/2314 DATED 30.11.2013

ANNEXURE R22 TRUE COPY OF OFCH LETTER NO-BG/VETAN/2314 DATED 4.12.2014 REGARDING RECOVERY OF RS.84,238/-FROM THE APPLICATIONS PENSION

ANNEXURE R23 TRUE COPY OF CORRIGENDUM PPO NO-

C/CORR/FYS/15747/2014 18.9-2014

ANNEXURE R24 TRUE COPY OF CHANDA P.I.C.NO-897028/E DATED 19-10-2013 OP (CAT) NO. 208 OF 2017

ANNEXURE R32 TRUE COPY OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JUDGMENT DATED 17-8-2012 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO-5899 OF 2012-(CHANDI PRASAD UNIYAL ANDORD VS.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS)

ANNEXURE R33 TRUE COPY OF DOPT NEW DELHI ID NO-

18/26/2011-ESTT (PAY-1)DATED 6-2-2014

ANNEXURE R34 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 30-9-2015 OF THE HON'BLE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,MADRAS BENCH IN OA NO-334/2012

EXHIBIT P1. COPY OF THE OA 180/00326/2015 DATED 24.4.15 FILED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2. COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT DATED 30.10.15 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS.

EXHIBIT P3. COPY OF THE REJOINDER DATED 10.12.15 FILED BY THE APPLICANT.

EXHIBIT P4. COPY OF THE ADDITIONAL REPLY STATEMENT DATED 29.2.16 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS.

EXHIBIT P5. COPY OF THE ORDER IN OA NO.180/00326/2015 DATED 24.3.16 OF THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM BENCH.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter