Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14811 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 June, 2024
Crl.M.C.2921/2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 14TH JYAISHTA, 1946
CRL.MC NO. 2921 OF 2024
CRIME NO.956/2015 OF PERINGOME POLICE STATION, KANNUR
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN SC NO.180 OF 2017 OF
ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT/SUB COURT/COMMERCIAL COURT, PAYYANNUR
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4:
1 ANIL KUMAR, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O NARAYANAN,
POORAKADAVATH (H), KUTTUR P.O,
KANNUR DISTRICT., PIN - 670306
2 RANJITH P.M, AGED 40 YEARS
S/O RAGHAVAN, MEEJALE VEETIL (H),
MATHAMANGALAM, ERAMAM P.O,
PUNIYAMKODE, KANNUR DISTRICT., PIN - 670307
3 SIJU M, AGED 40 YEARS,
S/O GOVINDHAN, MUNDAYATT (H),
ERAMAM P.O,
KANNUR DISTRICT., PIN - 670307
4 MANOJ, AGED 45 YEARS,
S/O KUNJIRAMAN, MUNDAYATT (H),
KUTTUR AMSOM,
KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670306
BY ADVS.
B.MUHAMMED SHAHEEL
R.N.SANDEEP
KEERTHI VIJAYAN
JYOTHI R. NAIR
RESPONDENTS/STATE:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031
2 MIDHILAJ, AGED 29 YEARS
S/O ABDUL NASAR,
MEETHILEAPURAYIL (H),
ERAMAM P.O, MATHAMANGALAM,
KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670307.
Crl.M.C.2921/2024
2
3 AFTAB, AGED 29 YEARS
S/O ABDULLA, SUHARA MANZIL, ERAMAM AMSOM,
MATHAMANGALAM, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670307
4 FAHADH M.P, AGED 31 YEARS
S/O ABDUL RAHEEM, FAHADH MAHAL, MEETHILEAPURAYIL
(H), MATHAMANGALAM, ERAMAM AMSOM, KANNUR DISTRICT,
PIN - 670307
BY ADV RANGEETH G.S.
SREEJA V.(PP)
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C.2921/2024
3
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
......................................................
Crl.M.C.No.2921 of 2024
...................................................
Dated this the 4th day of June, 2024
ORDER
Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C
to quash all proceedings against them.
2. Petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 4 in S.C.No.180/2017 on the files
of the Assistant Sessions Court, Payyannur, arising out of Crime
No.956/2015 of Peringome Police Station, Kannur registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324
and 308 r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The
second respondent is the de facto complainant and respondents 3
and 4 are injured witnesses.
3. According to the prosecution, accused had on 02.11.2015, formed
themselves into an unlawful assembly and restrained the de facto
complainant and his friends, and assaulted them, and thereby
committed the offences alleged.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned
counsel for the respondents, apart from the learned Public
Prosecutor.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter
has been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioners
ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the
nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by
continuing the proceedings.
6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303],
the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High Court
can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the
victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal
proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and
Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and
Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another
[(2014) 9 SCC 653].
7. I have perused Annexures-A2 to A4 affidavits filed by
respondents 2 to 4. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted
that upon verification, it is understood that the affidavits are
genuine, and the de facto complainant and other deponents stand
by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been
settled and no public interest is involved in this case. There is no
impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The continuance
of the proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.
Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in
S.C.No.180/2017 on the files of the Assistant Sessions Court,
Payyannur, are quashed.
This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.
sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/06/06/2024
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 956/2015 OF PERINGOME POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT PENDING BEFORE ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT (SUB COURT),
ANNEXURE A2 THE AFFIDAVITS SWORN BY THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 EXPRESSING THEIR WILLINGNESS TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS
ANNEXURE A3 THE AFFIDAVITS SWORN BY THE RESPONDENT NOS.3 EXPRESSING THEIR WILLINGNESS TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS
ANNEXURE A4 THE AFFIDAVITS SWORN BY THE RESPONDENT NOS.4 EXPRESSING THEIR WILLINGNESS TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS
TRUE COPY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!