Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6045 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 4TH PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 19646 OF 2015
PETITIONER:
M/S. INDROYAL CRAFTS PRIVATE LIMITED,
M.G.ROAD,ROYAL PLAZA,PATTOM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
VATTIYOORKKAVU,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.
BY ADVS.
SRI.RAVI KRISHNAN
SRI.RAHUL SHENOY
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER,
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION,REGIONAL OFFICE,
BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN,PATTOM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.
2 THE RECOVERY OFFICER,
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION,REGIONAL OFFICE,
BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN,PATTOM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.
BY ADV NITA N.S, SC, EPFO
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 19646 OF 2015
2
JUDGMENT
This writ petition has been filed projecting a grievance
that pending the consideration of Ext.P3 appeal by the
appellate Tribunal, the recovery proceedings have been
initiated to recover the amounts adjudicated in terms of
Exts.P1 and P2.
2. This writ petition was admitted on 30.06.2015
and has been pending since with an interim order against
recovery.
3. When this matter came up for consideration
before this Court on 31.01.2024, it was adjourned to
12.02.2024 at the request of the petitioner as the last chance
making it clear that no further adjournments will be granted
under any circumstances. On 12.02.2024, it was further
adjourned to be listed today.
4. When this matter is called out today, there is no
representation for the petitioner. That apart, it is to be noted
that while an appeal against an order imposing penalty
under Section 14B of the EPF Act may be maintainable WP(C) NO. 19646 OF 2015
before the Tribunal, the demand for interest under Section
7Q cannot be challenged by filing an appeal before the
Tribunal.
5. The learned Standing Counsel for the Provident
Fund Organization is also not in a position to inform this
Court as to what was happened to the statutory appeal.
In the light of the above, the writ petition will stand
dismissed for default.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK WP(C) NO. 19646 OF 2015
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19646/2015
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY ORDER DATED 04.08.2014 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 14 B EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT 1952 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY ORDER DATED 04.08.2014 PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 7 Q EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT 1952 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BEFORE THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,NEW DELHI AS A.T.A.NO.1290(07)2014 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY THE REVENUE RECOVERY CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!