Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6044 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 4TH PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 7077 OF 2017
PETITIONERS:
1 RADHAMMA K.N.
AGED 84 YEARS, W/O. LATE SIVASANKARA PANICKER,
THYKOODATHIL, NADAMA DESOM,
THRIPUNITHURA -682 301.
2 RUGMINI S.
D/O. LATE SIVASANKARA PANICKER, AGED 57 YEARS,
THYKOODATHIL, NADAMA DESOM,
THRIPUNITHURA -682 301.
3 JAYALAKSHMI
D/O. LATE SIVASANKARA PANICKER, AGED 49 YEARS,
THYKOODATHIL, NADAMA DESOM,
THRIPUNITHURA -682 301.
BY ADV SRI.BIJU ABRAHAM
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE
THRIPUNITHURA BRANCH, CENTRE POINT BUILDING,
THRIPUNITHURA-682 301.
2 RADHAKRISHNAN S.
AGE 55 YEARS, S/O.LATE SIVASANKARA PANICKER,
THAIKOODATHIL HOUSE, ELUMANACKAL TEMPLE ROAD,
EROOR (S), TRIPUNITHURA-682 306.
3 BALAKRISHNAN S.
AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.LATE SIVASANKARA PANICKER,
MATHYATH HOUSE, SAHRUDAYA ROAD, EROOR (S),
THRIPUNITHURA-682 306.
W.P.(C) No.7077/2017
-:2:-
4 NARAYANAN KUTTY S.
AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.LATE SIVASANKARA PANICKER,
THAIKOODATHIL HOUSE, KODAMKULANGARA,
TRIPUNITHURA-682 301.
5 SREEDHARAN S.
AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.LATE SIVASANKARA PANICKER,
THAIKOODATHIL HOUSE, KODAMKULANGARA,
TRIPUNITHURA-682 301.
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR (SC-SBI)
SRI.JOHN VIPIN
SRI.V.K.KISHOR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.7077/2017
-:3:-
JUDGMENT
This writ petition was filed by the wife and two children of
Late. C. P. Sivasankara Panicker regarding the release of
amounts lying in a savings bank account maintained by
Late. C.P.Sivasankara Panicker with the erstwhile State Bank of
Travancore (now the State Bank of India). It is appears that
pending the writ petition, the 1 st petitioner (wife of
Late. C. P. Sivasankara Panicker) has passed away. Since all the
legal heirs are already on record, the proceedings can continue
after recording that the 1st petitioner is no more.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent
bank would point out that the 4 th respondent, who is the son
and one of the legal heirs of Late. C. P. Sivasankara Panicker had
raised an objection. It is submitted that the bank had through
Ext.P9 communication informed the petitioners that the claim
can be considered subject to production of the documents
mentioned in Ext.P9.
3. Since a dispute has been raised by one of the legal
heirs, no direction can be issued by this Court to release the
amount to the petitioners 2 and 3.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition will stand disposed of
directing that on the petitioners 2 and 3 approaching the
1st respondent bank (now the State Bank of India,
Thrippunithura Branch) along with necessary documents as per
the norms of the bank, the claim for release of the amount shall
be considered in accordance with the law. Since the amount is
stated to be lying in a savings bank account, the Branch
Manager, State Bank of India, Trippunithura Branch, is directed
to transfer the entire amount in the savings bank account to a
fixed deposit with the highest rate of interest presently available
in the name of the nominee in the savings bank account or in the
name of the 2nd petitioner after obtaining necessary KYC
documents. However, the said amount shall not be released to
the 2nd petitioner and the fixed deposit receipt shall also be
retained by the Branch Manager and the amount in the fixed
deposit shall be released to the legal heirs of
Late. C.P.Sivasankara Panicker only on production of necessary
documents as directed in Ext.P9.
Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
ats JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7077/2017
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LEGAL HERISHIP CERTIFICATE
OF LATE SIVASANKARA PANICKER ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDR, KANAYANNUR DATED 26/11/2014 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OFT HE ACCOUNT DETAILS WITH STATEMENT HAVING A/C NO. 57058074133 OF LATE SIVASANKARA PANICKER WITH THE IST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE CLAIM FORMAT SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT BANK DATED 22/12/2016 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF DISCLAIMER GIVEN BY THE 2ND AND 3RD PETITIONERS ALONG WITH 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE IST RESPONDENT BANK DATED 20/12/2016 EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER GIVEN BY THE 2ND PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 23/11/2016 EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER GIVEN BY THE 3RD PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 23/11/2016 EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER GIVEN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 05/12/2016 EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER GIVEN BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 23/11/2016 EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 09/12/2016 OF THE IST RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD PETITIONER EXHIBIT P10 A TRUE COPY OF TH SUCCESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 05-02-2018 IN SUCCESSION O.P.NO.5/2017 ON THE FILES OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!