Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Reji Cv vs Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd, No. 1758
2024 Latest Caselaw 5843 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5843 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

Reji Cv vs Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd, No. 1758 on 23 February, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                           PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024/4TH PHALGUNA, 1945
                   OP (DRT) NO. 84 OF 2024
        SA No.65/2020 OF THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I,
                          ERNAKULAM
PETITIONERS/APPLICANT IN S.A:
    1      REJI CV
           AGED 54 YEARS, S/O VARKKI JOSEPH,
           PROPRIETOR, SILENT VALLEY RUBBERS
           MANNARKKAD CHAKKUPURAKKAL HOUSE,
           PANTHALLOOR HILLS P.O., ANAKKAYAM,
           MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676 521.

    2      V. D SIBI
           AGED 58 YEARS, S/O VATHACHIRA DEVASYA,
           PALACHODU P.O., MALAPPURAM,
           PIN - 679 338.

           BY ADVS.
                S.RENJITH
                P.K.SREEVALSAKRISHNAN
                K.R.PRATHISH
                S.UNNIKRISHNAN (NELLAD)
                JACOB ZACHARIAH
                PREETHY P. JOSEPH

RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT IN S.A:
           URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, NO. 1758
           B NO. 10, URBAN BANK BUILDING PATTABI ROAD,
           PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
           REP BY ITS THE AUTHORISED OFFICER,
           PIN - 679 322.

           BY ADV
                U.K DEVIDAS

     THIS OP (DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 23.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(DRT) No.84 of 2024
                                :2:




                          JUDGMENT

Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2024

The petitioners are the applicants and the

respondent is the defendant in SA No. 65/2020, which is

pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Ernakulam.

2. The 1st petitioner availed a Cash Credit loan from

the respondent-Bank mortgaging his agricultural property.

After inspection, the respondent has sanctioned an amount

of Rs. 2,80,00,000/- to the 1 st petitioner. The loan was taken

for his rubber unit. The 1st petitioner defaulted the repayment

due to loss happened in the business and due to the flood

occurred. The cultivation in the scheduled property has also

perished and the 1st petitioner suffered huge loss. The

repayment of loan fell into arrears. The Defendant issued

notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and

Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of

Securities Interest Act, 2002, alleging that there is dues of

Rs.2,85,28,249/-.

3. The petitioners have sent a detailed reply to the

above notice. Without considering the same, the

respondent-Bank issued sale notice to sell the property

alleging that there is dues of Rs.3,27,92,563/- till 31.05.2019.

The petitioners have preferred S.A No. 65 of 2020 before the

Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Ernakulam under Section 17 of

the SARFAESI Act.

4. The petitioners state that at the time of admission,

the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Ernakulam granted interim

order and confirmation of the sale was deferred till next date

of hearing and listed the matter on 06.03.2020. Thereafter,

on subsequent posting dates, the respondent appeared and

sought time for filing written statement. Thereafter, there was

11 postings for the case, but case was adjourned by notice

and the case is posted to 04.04.2024. In the meanwhile, the

petitioners were served with a notice by the Advocate

Commissioner in respect of M.C No. 848/2023 filed before

the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Manjeri stating that he

will take the possession of the property on 08.02.2024.

4. Since the case was posted to 04.04.2024, the

petitioners filed IA No.680 of 2024 before the Debts

Recovery Tribunal-I, Ernakulam to advance the case to near

date for hearing the matter. But even after the petition has

been filed, the said application was not so far considered and

case is not advanced, contends the petitioners.

5. The grievance of the petitioners appears to be that

the SA is pending for a considerable long period and all of a

sudden, the respondents have invoked Section 14 of the

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets

Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and the Advocate

Commissioner is likely to take over physical possession of

the mortgaged property soon. It is in such circumstances,

that the petitioners have filed Ext.P6 I.A. No.680 of 2024

seeking to advance the Securitisation Application from

04.04.2024 to a near date for hearing.

6. Standing Counsel entered appearance on behalf

of the respondent and resisted the original petition. The

Standing Counsel submitted that the petitioners are

consistent defaulters and huge amounts are due to the Bank

and the dues exceed Rs.5,72,00,000/-. The petitioners were

comfortably sitting after filing the SA without making any

payment. When the Section 14 proceedings are initiated, the

petitioners have approached this Court. The O.P.(DRT) is

without any merit and is liable to be dismissed, contended

the respondent.

7. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for

the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel

representing the respondent.

8. The petitioners have now filed Ext.P6 I.A. No.680

of 2024 seeking advancement of the Securitisation

Application from 04.04.2024, invoking Section 19 (25) of the

Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions

Act. The property mortgaged by the petitioners is under the

threat of take over. In the circumstances, it would be only just

and proper that the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I considers

Ext.P6 application expeditiously.

OP(DRT) is therefore disposed of directing the Debts

Recovery Tribunal-I, Ernakulam to consider Ext.P6 I.A. and

take appropriate decision thereon in accordance with law

within a period of two weeks. It is made clear that I have not

expressed anything on merit over the claims of either parties.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE AMR

APPENDIX OF OP (DRT) 84/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SA NO. 65 OF 2020 FILED BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I ERNAKULAM.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO.316 OF 2020 IN SA NO. 65 OF 2020 FILED BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I ERNAKULAM.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE PROCEEDINGS DATED 22.02.2020 IN IA NO.316 OF 2020 IN SA NO. 65 OF 2020 FILED BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I ERNAKULAM.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I ERNAKULAM DATED 05.09.2023.


Exhibit P5            TRUE   COPY    OF    THE    NOTICE   DATED
                      09.01.2024      FROM      THE     ADVOCATE
                      COMMISSIONER IN M.C NO. 848 OF 2023 OF
                      CHIEF    JUDICIAL     MAGISTRATE    COURT,
                      MANJERI.

Exhibit P6            TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO. 680 OF 2024
                      FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE
                      DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I ERNAKULAM
                      DATED 08.02.2024.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter