Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Chandrasekharan Nair vs Autokast Limited
2024 Latest Caselaw 5068 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5068 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

K.Chandrasekharan Nair vs Autokast Limited on 15 February, 2024

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
 THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 26TH MAGHA, 1945
                      WP(C) NO. 32840 OF 2015
PETITIONER:

           K.CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR
           AGED 62 YEARS
           (RETIRED MANAGER, AUTOKAST LTD.), NALAMKUZHIYIL
           HOUSE (CHANDRA PRABHA), KUDAVECHOOR P.O.,
           VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM-686 144.
           BY ADVS.
           SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY
           SRI.S.A.ANAND
           SMT.L.ANNAPOORNA
           SRI.K.A.BALAN
           SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO
           SMT.N.SANTHA
           SRI.V.VARGHESE

RESPONDENTS:

     1       AUTOKAST LIMITED
             S.N.PURAM P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA-688 582,
             REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
     2       STATE OF KERALA
             REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
             INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
             BY ADVS.
             SRI.K.ANAND (SR.)
             SMT.LATHA ANAND

OTHER PRESENT:

             SRI BS SYAMANTAK, GP


      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   15.02.2024,   THE   COURT    ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.32840/2015

                                           2




                     P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
                      --------------------------------
                     W.P.(C).No.32840 of 2015
               ----------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 15th day of February, 2024


                                    JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed with following prayers:

i. declare that the petitioner is entitled to immediate payment of all his retirement benefits including D.A. arrears, leave encashment, medical reimbursement, conveyance allowance and pay revision arrears due to him from the respondents with interest at the rate of 12% per annum thereon.

ii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order оr direction commanding the respondents to disburse forthwith to the petitioner all his retirement benefits, D.A. arrears, leave encashment, medical reimbursement, conveyance allowance and pay revision arrears and any other amount found due, with interest at the rate of 12% per annum thereon from the dates on which they fell due till the date of payment. iii. grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case including the costs of this Writ Petition (Civil). (SIC)

2. Petitioner retired from service on 31.05.2011 on

superannuation, while working as Manager (Marketing) in the

service of the 1st respondent, a Government of Kerala

undertaking. According to the petitioner, he is entitled an

amount of Rs.8,00,043/- towards pensionary benefits. It is

submitted that he was given only an amount of Rs.5,73,429/-

and the balance amount of Rs.2,26,614/- is due to the

petitioner. Hence this writ petition.

3. In this writ petition, a counter affidavit is filed by

the 1st respondent, in which it is stated that, as per their books

of account, the petitioner is entitled an amount of

Rs.1,11,765/- towards DA arrears and all other amounts under

difference heads claimed by the petitioner has already been

settled. Hence this Court passed an order on 17.05.2016,

which is extracted hereunder:

"There will be an interim direction to the first respondent to disburse the admitted amounts due to the petitioner towards retiral benefits within two months. It is seen that the liability to the extend of Rs.1,11,765/-(Rupees One lakh eleven thousand seven hundred and sixty five only) towards the DA arrears is conceded in the counter affidavit."

4. Based on the above order, it is submitted by the

counsel for the 1st respondent that the amount is disbursed.

Now a reply affidavit is filed by the petitioner. It will be better

to extract paragraph 5 of the above reply affidavit:

5. It is submitted that I am entitled to a sum of Rs.1,17,955/- towards DA arrears, a sum of Rs.5,503/- by way of salary revision arrears(1996), a sum of Rs.6350/- by way of conveyance allowance for the period upto June 2003 and a sum of Rs.41,200/- by way of conveyance allowance for 103 months at the rate of Rs.400/- per month. The total amount thus due will come to Rs.1,71,008/-. I am also entitled to interest for the said amount for the period from 01.06.2011 till the date of payment."

5. According to the petitioner, the amount mentioned

in the reply affidavit is not disbursed. If that be the case, the

petitioner can file a fresh representation narrating the balance

amount due to the petitioner and if such a representation is

received, the 1st respondent will consider the same and

disburse the eligible amount to the petitioner.

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with following

directions:

1. The petitioner is free to file a fresh

representation before the 1st respondent

regarding the balance amount due,

within one month from the date of

receipt of a certified copy of this

judgment.

2. Once such a representation is received,

the 1st respondent will consider the

same and pass appropriate orders in it,

after affording an opportunity of

hearing to the petitioner, and disburse

the eligible amount, as expeditiously as

possible, at any rate, within three

months from the date of receipt of the

representation.

3. The 1st respondent will also issue a

statement showing the details of the

payment already effected regarding the

retirement benefits disbursed.

sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JV JUDGE

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 32840/2015

PETITIONER EXHIBITS P1 : COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER NO.LP&A: CO: III/8000 DTD.30.6.1986 OF THE GENERAL MANAGER OF SILKL.

P2 : COPY OF THE ORDER NO.AKL/PER/161 DTD.31.5.2011 OF THE ASSISTANT MANAGER (HRD & A) OF AUTOKAST LTD.

P3 : COPY OF THE ORDER SANCTIONING THE PENSION TO THE PETITIONER.

P4 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.7.9.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE MANAGING DIRECTOR.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter