Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4931 Ker
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 20TH MAGHA, 1945
RFA NO. 108 OF 2004
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS NO.230/1999 DATED 30.9.2003 OF
ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 M/S.THUSHARA TRADERS,
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM,
DISTRIBUTOR & GENERAL MERCHANTS,
NEYYATTINKARA.
2 MOHANDAS K.,
THUSHARA, SWADESHABHIMANI NAGAR,
NEYYATTINKARA.
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR
SRI.M.SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
M/S.CROMPTION GREAVES LTD.,
CHERUPUSHPAM BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, 300-6,
SHANMUGHAM ROAD, COCHIN-682 031,
REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER,
MR.E.SIMON ZACHARIA(BRANCH ACCOUNTANT).
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.JACOB VARGHESE SR.
SRI.VIVEK VARGHESE P.J.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 09.02.2024, ALONG WITH RFA.109/2004, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
R.F.A.Nos.108 & 109 of 2004
2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 20TH MAGHA, 1945
RFA NO. 109 OF 2004
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS NO.322/2001 DATED 30.09.2003
OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,ERNAKULAM
APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:
1 ANUGRAHA ENTERPRISES,
POOVAR ROAD, NEYYATTINKARA,
REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER, K.MOHAN DAS.
2 THUSHARA TRADERS,
POOVAR ROAD,NEYYATTINKARA,
REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER, K.MOHAN DAS.
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR
SRI.M.SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,
CROMPTON GREAVES LTD.,
I, DR.V.B.GANDHI MARG,, BOMBAY-400 023.
2 THE BRANCH MANAGER,
CROMPTON GREAVES LTD.,
5TH FLOOR, 300-6, CHERUPUSHPAM BUILDING,
SHANMUGHAM ROAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 09.02.2024, ALONG WITH RFA.108/2004, THE COURT ON THE
SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
R.F.A.Nos.108 & 109 of 2004
3
C.S.SUDHA, J.
-----------------------------------------------------------
R.F.A.Nos.108 & 109 of 2004
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 09th day of February, 2024
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that the
second appellant is no more and that the legal representatives are not
interested in prosecuting the matter.
Hence, in these circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for non
prosecution.
Sd/-
C.S.SUDHA JUDGE ak
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!