Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shihab vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 4637 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4637 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

Shihab vs State Of Kerala on 6 February, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                             PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 17TH MAGHA, 1945
                     CRL.MC NO. 406 OF 2024
CRIME NO.71/2009 OF SASTHAMCOTTA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM
  AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT SC 798/2018 OF ASSISTANT
           SESSIONS COURT/SUB COURT, KARUNAGAPPALLY
PETITIONER/ACCUSED A4 :

           SHIHAB, AGED 39 YEARS
           S/O ALIYARU KUNJU, KOCHUTHUNDIL VEEDU,
           THEKKEN MYNAGAPPALLY MURI,
           MYNAGAPPALLY VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR THALUK,
           KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690 519.
           BY ADV P.V.DILEEP


RESPONDENT/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT :

    1      STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
           HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
    2      THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
           SASTHAMCOTTA POLICE STATION,
           SASTHAMCOTTA P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 690 521.
    3      SIBU, AGED 41 YEARS
           S/O VISWAMBHARAN,
           KOCHU VEETTIL PADINJATTATHIL,
           NORTH OF UDAYA JUNCTION,
           IDAVANASSERI MURI,
           MYNAGAPPALLY VILLAGE,
           KUNNATHOOR THALUK,
           KOLLAM DISTRICT., PIN - 690 519.
           SRI. NOUSHAD K.A. (PP)


THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.02.2024,    THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   PASSED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C. No.406 of 2024
                                              2




                          BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                     ......................................................
                              Crl.M.C. No.406 of 2024
                      ...................................................
                  Dated this the 6th day of February, 2024


                                          ORDER

Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C

to quash all proceedings against him.

2. Petitioner is the 4th accused in S.C.No.798/2018 on the files of

the Sub Court, Karunagappally arising out of Crime No.71/2009

of Sasthamcotta Police Station, registered for the offence under

Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 308 r/w Section 149 of

the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The 3 rd respondent is the de facto

complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, on 12.02.2009 the accused

persons formed themselves into an unlawful assembly, in

furtherance of their common intention, and armed with deadly

weapons assaulted the de facto complainant, and thereby

committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public

Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the

petitioner ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that,

considering the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would

be served by continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC

303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the

High Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes

between the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the

criminal proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder

Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC

466] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand

and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure-3 affidavit filed by the 3 rd respondent.

The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon

verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and

the de facto complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am

satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public interest

is involved in this case. There is no impediment for granting

the prayer for quashing. The continuance of the proceedings

will only be an exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioner in

S.C.No.798/2018 on the files of the Sub Court, Karunagappally,

are quashed as against the petitioner alone.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

AMV/09/02/2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE-1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 71/2009 OF SASTHAMCOTTA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

ANNEXURE-2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED 04.11.2017 IN S.C.NO. 212/2013 OF THE ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGES COURT KARUNAGAPPALLY AGAINST ACCUSED NOS. 3, 5 AND 6.

ANNEXURE-3 A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 3 RD RESPONDENT/INURED.

ANNEXURE-4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CITATION REPORTED IN 2022 (3) KHC 69 DATED 25.03.2022.

TRUE COPY

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter