Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4485 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 17TH MAGHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 17194 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
HASSAINAR,
AGED 51 YEARS
S/O ALAVI, PERKUTH, VENGASSERI, EDAPPATTA,
PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN 679326.
BY ADV RAFFEEKH.K
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY IT SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN
695001.
2 RECOVERY OFFICER,
PERINTHALMANNA CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL & RURAL
DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD NO. P505, PERINTHALMANNNA,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. PIN 679322.
3 THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR,
PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN
679322.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
EDAPPATTA VILLAGE, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 679322.
BY ADVS.P.VIJAYAMMA
PRINSUN PHILIP
BY SRI V KRISHNA MENON, RECOVERY OFFICER,
PERINTHALMANNA CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL & RURAL
W.P.(C).17194 of 2022 2
DEVELOPMENT BANK
BY SRI. P M SHAMEER, GP.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).17194 of 2022 3
JUDGMENT
The petitioner states that he availed a loan for Rs. 15 lakhs from the
second respondent Bank in 2016. The immovable property owned by the
petitioner was furnished by way of security. He states that his wife was
diagnosed with cancer, requiring him to incur substantial expenses for her
treatment. His financial resources were impeded, which impacted his capacity
to effect prompt repayment. Consequently, revenue recovery proceedings were
initiated under section 34 of the Act, 1968, to realize the amounts. In the said
circumstances, he approached the Government, and an order was passed to
facilitate him to repay the amount in 36 installments. It is asserted that the
petitioner was unable to comply with the directions, and the order is no longer
in force. He stated to have preferred Ext.P5 representation before the 1st
respondent. Though no orders have been passed, revenue recovery
proceedings have now been initiated. It is in the above backdrop that this
petition is filed seeking directions.
2. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Bank submits
that the total outstanding as of date is Rs.24,90,944/-. It is further submitted
that as ordered by this Court on 27.05.2022, a sum of Rs. 50,000/- has been
paid. It is submitted that the bank is willing to grant the petitioner an
opportunity to clear the outstanding amount in installments. He submits that
installments should strictly be limited to eight payments.
3. Upon careful consideration of the submissions made by both parties, it
is evident that the petitioner owes in excess of Rs.24.90 lakhs to the 2nd
respondent Bank. The respondents, very fairly, have agreed to permit the
petitioner to settle these debts through a limited number of installments. As a
measure of last resort, I am inclined to issue directions to facilitate the
petitioner in discharging his financial obligations to the 2nd respondent. This
approach is deemed necessary to provide a structured pathway for the
petitioner to clear off his monetary liabilities in a manageable manner.
4. Resultantly, this writ petition is ordered, and the following directions
are issued:
(i) The petitioner shall approach the 2nd respondent with a request to inform him of the details of the outstanding amount together with interest and other charges due from her in respect of the loan account. If such a request is made within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, the 2nd respondent shall forthwith issue a statement in writing detailing the amounts.
(ii) On receipt of such a statement, the petitioner shall pay the amounts shown therein in fifteen (15) equal monthly installments. The first of which shall be payable on 15.3.2024, and the balance shall be paid on every succeeding month.
(iii) If the amounts are diligently paid in terms of the directions above, coercive proceedings initiated against him by the respondents for the realization of the amount shall be kept in abeyance.
(iv) It is made clear that if the petitioner commits default of any two installments, he will lose the benefit of this judgment, and the concerned respondents will be free to continue the recovery proceedings against him from the stage at which he presently stands and recover the entire amount along with interest and other charges.
(v) It is further made clear that no application for an extension of time will be entertained.
SD/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE DCS
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17194/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit TRUE COPY OF THE PARTICULARS OF CANCER TREATMENT OF P1 THE PETITIONER'S WIFE.
Exhibit TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 13.12.2021 ISSUED BY THE P2 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit TRUE COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE DATED P3 05.02.2022.
Exhibit THE ORDER DATED 22.03.2022 ISSUED BY THE REVENUE P4 DEPARTMENT.
Exhibit TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24.5.2022 P5 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!