Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajesh vs Kerala Financial Enterprises Limited
2024 Latest Caselaw 4478 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4478 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

Rajesh vs Kerala Financial Enterprises Limited on 6 February, 2024

Author: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

Bench: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                            PRESENT
       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
   TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 17TH MAGHA, 1945
                    WP(C) NO. 4459 OF 2024
PETITIONER:

          RAJESH
          AGED 42 YEARS
          S/O. RAJAN, UNDASSAN VEETTIL, PADEETTATHIL,
          MUTHUKULAM NORTH, CHOOLATHERUVU P.O., MUTHUKULAM,
          ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690506

          BY ADVS.
          SHAKTHI PRAKASH
          MUHASIN K.M.
          AMJATHA D.A.
          FARHANA K.H.


RESPONDENTS:

    1     KERALA FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED
          REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER REGISTERED OFFICE,
          'BHADRATHA', P. B. NO. 510, MUSEUM ROAD, CHEMBUKKAVU,
          THRISSUR, PIN - 680020

    2     THE BRANCH MANAGER
          KERALA FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED, HARIPPAD I
          BRANCH OFFICE, HARIPPAD, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690514


          SRI. SALIL NARAYANAN K A, SC FOR KSFE



     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 06.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C).4459 of 2024                  2




                                  JUDGMENT

The petitioner states that he secured financial facilities from the 1st

respondent financier. According to the petitioner, he suffered a serious loss in

his business and could not make prompt repayments on time. This has led

the respondents to initiate coercive proceedings to realize the amounts due.

It is on these assertions that this Writ Petition is filed seeking direction to the

2nd respondent to grant the opportunity to the petitioner to remit the

amounts in installments.

2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents

submits that the petitioner has subscribed two chits and one loan, and as of

14.01.2024 total outstanding due from the petitioner is Rs.17,63,136/-. It is

further submitted that the first respondent is not averse to granting an

opportunity to the petitioner to clear the amount due in installments.

However, he submits that no more than six installments be granted.

3. Upon careful consideration of the submissions made by both

parties, it is evident that the petitioner owes in excess of Rs.17 lakhs to the

first respondent. The respondents, very fairly, have agreed to permit the

petitioner to settle these debts through a limited number of installments. As

a measure of last resort, I am inclined to issue directions to facilitate the

petitioner in discharging his financial obligations to the first respondent. This

approach is deemed necessary to provide a structured pathway for the

petitioner to clear off his monetary liabilities in a manageable manner.

Resultantly, this writ petition is ordered, and the following directions

are issued:

1. The petitioner shall approach the 1st respondent with

a request to inform him of the details of the

outstanding, together with interest and other charges

due from him in respect of the loan account. If such a

request is made within two weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this judgment, the respondent

shall forthwith issue a statement in writing detailing

the amounts.

2. On receipt of such a statement, the petitioner shall

pay the amounts shown therein in twelve (12) equal

monthly installments commencing from 15.3.2024 and

continue to pay the same on every successive month

thereafter until the entire dues are wiped off.

3. If the amounts are diligently paid in terms of the

directions above, coercive proceedings initiated

against him by the respondent for the realization of

the amount shall be kept in abeyance.

4. It is made clear that if the petitioner commits default

of any two installments, he will lose the benefit of this

judgment, and the concerned respondent will be free

to continue the recovery proceedings against him

from the stage at which he presently stands and

recover the entire amount along with interest and

other charges.

5. It is further made clear that no application for an

extension of time will be entertained.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE IAP

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4459/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.3/2019/A1-29 DATED 26.12.2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BRANCH MANAGER

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.62/2019/A2-109 DATED 26.12.2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BRANCH MANAGER

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.RCL-1529 DATED 26.12.2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BRANCH MANAGER

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter