Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vivek A,S vs Regional Passport Officer
2024 Latest Caselaw 4270 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4270 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2024

Kerala High Court

Vivek A,S vs Regional Passport Officer on 1 February, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                        PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 12TH MAGHA, 1945
                 WP(C) NO. 2776 OF 2024
  (CC No.618/2021 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE,
                     IRINJALAKUDA)
PETITIONER:

         VIVEK A.S.,
         AGED 26 YEARS,
         SON OF SAJEEV,
         AKLIPARMBIL HOUSE,
         VALLIVATTOM VILLAGE, VALLIVATTOM P.O,
         THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680123

         BY ADVS.
         K.JAGADEESH
         V.RENJU
         NIKHEL K GOPINATH


RESPONDENTS:

    1    REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER,
         REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE,
         PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI, PIN - 682036

    2    SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
         IRINJALAKUDA POLICE STATION,
         IRINJALAKUDA,
         THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680121

         BY ADVS.
         SRI.S.MANU, DSGI
         SRI.SREEJITH V.S., GOVERNMENT PLEADER

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP       FOR
ADMISSION ON 01.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME       DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.2776/2024
                               :2:




                        JUDGMENT

Dated this the 1st day of February, 2024

The petitioner, who is holder of an Indian

Passport, is the 12th accused in C.C.No.618 of 2021 on

the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court,

Irinjalakuda. The crime has been registered for offences

punishable under Sections 341, 323, 427, 143, 147, 148

and 294(b) read with Section 149 of IPC.

2. The petitioner states that he submitted an

application to the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court,

Irinjalakuda seeking permission to travel abroad for taking

up employment. The Court has permitted to travel abroad

for a period of two years. The 1 st respondent-Regional

Passport Officer, without considering the order of the

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, has refused to issue

Police Clearance Certificate on the ground that a criminal

case is pending. The rejection of petitioner's application

as per Ext.P6 is illegal, contends the counsel for the

petitioner.

3. Deputy Solicitor General of India representing

the 1st respondent submitted that the petitioner's

application has been considered and it has been closed

as is evidenced from Ext.P6. As the petitioner is involved

in a crime and since the Judicial First Class Magistrate's

Court has granted permission to the petitioner to travel

abroad for a period of two years, if the petitioner submits

a fresh application, the question of issuing a customised

Police Clearance Certificate to the petitioner can be

considered in the light of the judgment in Siju v. Regional

Passport Officer (2021 SCC Online Ker 9667).

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the Deputy Solicitor General of India.

5. Ext.P6 communication of the Regional

Passport Officer would indicate that the petitioner was

issued with a File Closure Intimation Notice dated

15.12.2023 and there was no response from the petitioner

till date. It was under such circumstances that the

application of the petitioner is closed.

6. Be that as it may, this Court in the judgment in

Siju v. Regional Passport Officer (supra) has held that

even if a criminal case is registered against the applicants

for passports, their applications for Police Clearance

Certificate can be considered and a customised Police

Clearance Certificate can be issued.

7. In view of the afore judgment, it would only be

just and proper that the petitioner's application be

considered. However, since the petitioner's application

already stands closed as per Ext.P6, the petitioner will

have to make an application afresh.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of

permitting the petitioner to make a fresh application for

Police Clearance Certificate supported by the Court order.

If the petitioner submits an application within a period of

two weeks from today, the 1st respondent shall consider

and take appropriate decision thereon in the light of the

judgment in Siju v. Regional Passport Officer (supra)

within a further period of two weeks.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE SR

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 2776/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit P1 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE PASSPORT IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PCC APPLICATION FORM SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 26- 6-2023 Exhibit P3 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 20-10-2023 Exhibit P4 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 29-11-2023 Exhibit P5 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE, IRINJALAKUDA IN CRL.M.P NO.12861 OF 2023 IN C.C.NO.618 OF 2021 DATED 3- 1-2024 Exhibit P6 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 19-1-2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter