Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 23253 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2024
2024:KER:59724
RSA Nos.1158/2008, 1159/2008
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1946
R.S.A.NO.1158 OF 2008
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.02.2008 IN AS NO.17 OF 2005 OF PRINCIPAL SUB
COURT, KOZHIKODE
ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.11.2004 IN OS NO.809 OF 1989 OF PRINCIPAL
MUNSIFF COURT I, KOZHIKODE
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/2ND PLAINTIFF:
MURALEEDHARAKURUP
S/O.KOLANGARAVEETTIL AMBUJAKSHI AMMA, PADINJATTUMURI, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV. SRI.S.A.SAJU (EXPIRED)
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
KANARAN NAIR
S/O.PALAZHIKUZHIYIL LAKSHMI AMMA, KOLONGORAKANDIYIL, PARANNUR,
KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.08.2024, ALONG
WITH RSA.1159/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2024:KER:59724
RSA Nos.1158/2008, 1159/2008
2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1946
RSA Nos.1159 OF 2008
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.02.2008 IN AS NO.16 OF 2005 OF PRINCIPAL SUB
COURT, KOZHIKODE
ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.11.2004 IN OS NO.147 OF 1989 OF PRINCIPAL
MUNSIFF COURT I, KOZHIKODE
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/2ND DEFENDANT:
MURALEEDHARAKURUP
S/O.KOLANGARAVEETTIL AMBUJAKSHI AMMA, PADINJATTUMURI, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV. SRI.S.A. SAJU (EXPIRED)
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
KANARAN NAIR
S/O.PALAZHIKUZHIYIL LAKSHMI AMMA, KOLONGORAKANDIYIL, PARANNUR,
KOZHIKODE.
BY ADVS.
SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH
SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02.08.2024, ALONG WITH
RSA.1158/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2024:KER:59724
RSA Nos.1158/2008, 1159/2008
3
JUDGMENT
[RSA Nos.1158/2008, 1159/2008]
1. In both these appeals, as per the order dated 29.07.2024 the appellant was directed to take steps to implead the legal heirs of the deceased sole respondent within two days.
2. No steps were taken till today. Counsel for the appellant is no more.
3. The counsel, attached with the counsel for the appellant, submitted that he has no instruction from the appellant, in spite of sending communication.
4. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE SHG/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!