Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arun Devaraj vs The Regional Transport Officer
2024 Latest Caselaw 9786 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9786 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Arun Devaraj vs The Regional Transport Officer on 4 April, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                          PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                WP(C) NO. 13723 OF 2024
PETITIONER:

         ARUN DEVARAJ,
         AGED 30 YEARS,
         S/O DEVARAJAN, ARUN BHAVANAM,
         VARENICKAL, THEKKEKKARA P.O,
         THEKKEKARA VILLAGE, MAVEIKARA TALUK,
         ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690107

         BY ADVS.
         AJITH MURALI
         SWAPNA VIJAYAN
         MOHANAN M.K.


RESPONDENTS:

    1    THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER,
         REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE,
         MAVEILKKARA TALUK,
         ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690101
    2    RENUKA SURESH,
         AGED 28 YEARS,
         W/O SURESH, AMBALAVILA VADAKKETHIL,
         CHUNNAKARA P.O,
         CHUNNAKARA NADUVILE MURI, C
         HUNAKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK ,
         ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690534

         BY ADV.
         SRI.S.GOPINATHAN, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP       FOR
ADMISSION ON 04.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME       DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.13723/2024
                                :2:




                          JUDGMENT

Dated this the 4th day of April, 2024

The petitioner is the registered owner of JCB

(Excavator) bearing registration No.KL-13U-5808. The

petitioner has purchased the above vehicle in the year 2010

under the hypothecation of the Sakthi Finance Ltd. The

petitioner is having some financial dispute with the 2 nd

respondent. The 2nd respondent has filed a Civil Suit before

the Munsiff Court, Mavelikkara against the petitioner and his

father, and the Munsiff Court has issued interim order

staying alienation of vehicle till the disposal of the Suit.

2. As per the interim order in the Suit, the 1 st

respondent has locked the status of the petitioner's vehicle

and restrained transfer of vehicle, and it can be seen in the

online status of the vehicle. The 1 st respondent locked the

Ext.P2 status record of the vehicle showing O.S.No.316 of

2017 - 'Not to transfer the vehicle until further orders'.

Therefore, the petitioner is unable to even pay insurance

premium and hence it is not possible to use the vehicle. On

07.05.2023, the 2nd respondent has withdrawn the Suit by

way of filing a not press memo before the Munsiff Court,

Mavelikkara. The Munsiff Court accepted the not press

memo filed by the 2nd respondent and dismissed the Suit as

not pressed and passed Ext.P3 order.

3. Thereafter the petitioner approached the

1st respondent and submitted Ext.P3 order and requested to

take appropriate proceedings for removing the locked

status in respect of the vehicle. The 1 st respondent assured

that he would do the same soon. But even after repeated

requests, the 1st respondent has not taken any steps to

remove the locked status of the vehicle. Without removing

the locked status of the vehicle, the petitioner is unable to

handover the vehicle to anybody. So, the petitioner has

again approached the 1st respondent and submitted Ext.P4

representation along with copy of the Ext.P3 order

requesting the 1st respondent to take appropriate

proceedings to remove the locked status of the vehicle.

4. Hence, it is highly necessary to issue a direction

directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P4

representation and to take necessary action to remove the

locked status in respect of the petitioner's JCB (Excavator)

bearing registration No. KL-13U-5808 on the basis of

Ext.P3 order. Hence, the petitioner has filed this writ

petition.

5. Government pleader submitted that the system

was locked in view of O.S. No.316 of 2017 pending before

the Court of the Munsiff, Mavelikkara. The petitioner

submits that the Suit was dismissed as not pressed as per

Ext.P3. If that is true, the system can be unlocked and the

petitioner's application can be considered after hearing the

2nd respondent.

In view of the afore facts, the writ petition is

disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider the

question of unlocking of the system/portal and to consider

Ext.P4 representation and take appropriate decision

thereon within a period of three weeks after giving an

opportunity of hearing to the 2nd respondent, if necessary.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE SR

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13723/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit-P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER'S VEHICLE BEARING NO. KL-13 U -5808. Exhibit-P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ONLINE STATUS REPORT OF THE PETITIONER'S VEHICLE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit-P3              THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN O.S
                        NO.316/2017    OF    MUNSIFF    COURT,
                        MAVELIKKARA DATED 07.06.2023.
Exhibit-P4              THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION
                        SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE
                        THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 27.03.2024.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter