Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Venugopalan P.P vs The Director Of Social Justice
2024 Latest Caselaw 9700 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9700 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Venugopalan P.P vs The Director Of Social Justice on 4 April, 2024

Author: Devan Ramachandran

Bench: Devan Ramachandran

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                   PRESENT
           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
     THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                          WP(C) NO. 8176 OF 2024
PETITIONER:

             VENUGOPALAN P.P.
             AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. NADI,
             POTTEKALAMPADI HOUSE, VADAKKUMBRAM P.O.,
             EDAYOOR, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM - 676552
             BY ADV.
             SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL

RESPONDENTS:

       1     THE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL JUSTICE,
             DIRECTORATE OF SOCIAL JUSTICE,
             5TH FLOOR, VIKAS BHAVAN, PALAYAM,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033
       2     THE TIRUR CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL
             AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED
             TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676101
             REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER
       3     THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER
             THE TIRUR CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL
             AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED,
             HEAD OFFICE,TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM
             DISTRICT, PIN - 676101
             BY ADVS.
             SRI.SAYED MANSOOR BAFAKHY THANGAL - SC
             SMT.C.S.SHEEJA, SR.GP



       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON    04.04.2024,   THE    COURT    ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.8176 of 2024
                                  :2:




                             JUDGMENT

The limited plea of the petitioner in this case is that the 1 st

respondent - Director of Social Justice, be directed to consider

Ext.P8 representation, wherein, he has detailed his grievances and

the reasons why he has been incapacitated to pay a loan which he

has availed of from the 2nd respondent, which is primarily on

account of severe financial crisis.

2. However, when this matter was called today, the learned

Senior Government Pleader - Smt.C.S.Sheeja, submitted that,

Ext.P8 has already been considered by the 1 st respondent, and that

instructions have been given to the 2 nd respondent Bank to give

them all concessions and discounts as are eligible and to treat his

case with empathy, taking note of his precarious fiscal situation.

She handed over a copy of the same across the Bar, saying that one

such has been given to the learned counsel for the petitioner also.

She added that, therefore, it is for the 2nd respondent to now take a

final decision.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the 2 nd respondent -

Sri.Sayed Mansoor Bafakhy Thangal, submitted that his client has

nothing against the petitioner and that they are only interested in

recovery. He added that, therefore, if the petitioner is to approach

them with an appropriate application, the same will be considered

with all empathy that he deserves, adverting also to any

instructions that may have been received from the 1 st respondent.

4. Sri.C.M.Mohammed Iquabal - learned counsel for the

petitioner, acceded to the afore suggestion.

In the afore circumstances, I allow this Writ Petition, leaving

liberty to the petitioner to approach the 2 nd respondent with an

appropriate application for settlement of the loan account; and if

this is done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of

a copy of this judgment, its competent Authority will consider the

same, after affording him an opportunity of being heard and

adverting to any instructions that may have been received from the

1st respondent; thus culminating in an appropriate order and

necessary action thereon, as expeditiously as is possible, but not

later than two months thereafter.

Needless to say, until such time as the afore is done, and the

resultant order communicated to the petitioner, all further recovery

action against him qua the impugned notice will stand deferred.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE anm

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8176/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF PASSBOOK DATED NIL [MEMBERSHIP NO. V3462] Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT HOSPITAL, TIRUR DATED 26.03.2019 Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNITY CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE TIRUR TALUK OFFICE DATED 26.08.2021 Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 02.06.2022 Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 10.01.2023 Exhibit P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.(C).NO.2630/2023 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 25.01.2023 Exhibit P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P. (C).NO. 2630/2023 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 22.02.2023 Exhibit P8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 10.01.2024 Exhibit P9 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 15.01.2024

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter