Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sheena C.P vs District Collector
2024 Latest Caselaw 11608 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11608 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Sheena C.P vs District Collector on 23 April, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

     TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL    2024 / 3RD VAISAKHA, 1946

                        WP(C) NO. 13128 OF 2024

PETITIONER/S:

           SHEENA C.P.,
           AGED 53 YEARS, S/O C. PANKAJAKSHAN, PATTYERI VEEDU,
           KURUVISSERY P.O, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673010
           BY ADVS. K.MOHAMMED RAFEEQ BIBIN MATHEW P.M.MATHEW
           AMARNATH R LAL SANALDEV E.P. VISHNUMAYA ANANDAN
           SONYMON ANTONY AJMAL V. KARIM

RESPONDENT/S:

     1     DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
           CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673020
     2     REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
           CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673020
     3     TAHSILDHAR, KOZHIKKODE TALUK, KOZHIKKODE DISTRICT,
           PIN - 673019
     4     VILLAGE OFFICER,
           VALAYANAD VILLAGE, KOZHIKKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673007
     5     LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE,
           REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,
           THIRUVANIYOOR KRISHIBHAVAN, KOZHIKKODE DISTRICT,
           PIN - 673645
     6     AGRICULTURE OFFICER,
           THIRUVANIYOOR KRISHIBHAVAN, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,
           PIN - 673645

OTHER PRESENT:

           SRI. AJITH VISWANATHAN- GP

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WPC 13128/2024
                                   -2-



                          JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 23rd day of April 2024)

The petitioner, who is the owner of 8 Ares 86.28 Square

Metres of property in Valaynadu Village of Kozhikkode Taluk in

Kozhikkode District, has filed the writ petition seeking to direct

the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer to consider

Ext.P3 application and to pass orders thereon, within a time

frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner states that he is owner in possession

of 8 Ares 86.28 Square Metres of land comprised in Survey

No.203/74 of Valaynadu Village of Kozhikkode Taluk in

Kozhikkode District. The land is garden land. It is not cultivated

with paddy. It is not fit for paddy cultivation either. However,

the land is described as nanja in Revenue records.

3. The petitioner wants to use the land for other

purposes. Hence, the petitioner filed Ext.P3 application in

Form-6 before the Revenue Divisional Officer, invoking the

provisions of Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy

Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. The application was filed on

08.11.2023. The application has not been considered so far.

Unless the application is considered expeditiously, the

petitioner will be put to untold hardship and loss, contends the

petitioner.

4. The Government Pleader representing the

respondents resisted the writ petition. The Government Pleader

controverted all material allegations made by the petitioner, in

the writ petition. The Government Pleader, however, submitted

that since the petitioner has invoked a statutory remedy under

the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and

Wetland Rules, 2008, the application submitted by the petitioner

can be considered by the competent authority in accordance

with law, provided the application is received, is complete in all

respects and is supported by all necessary documents.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Government Pleader representing the respondents.

6. The property of the petitioner is said to be a dry land,

but it has been described as nanja in Revenue records. Rule

12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland

Rules, 2008 provides for making applications for changing the

nature of land in Revenue records. The petitioner has invoked

the provisions of Rule 12(1) of the Rules, 2008 by filing

application in Form-6. It being a statutory application, the

Competent Authority is bound to consider the application and

pass orders thereon within a reasonable time.

The writ petition is therefore disposed of with a direction to

the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer to consider and

pass orders on Ext.P3 Form-6 application, if the same is

received supported by all requisite documents and paying

prescribed fee, if any, and to pass orders thereon in accordance

with law, within a period of three months.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE JS

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13128/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 10.08.2023 ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT.

Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF DATA BANK ISSUED BY THE SIXTH RESPONDENT.

Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 08.11.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter