Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jaina vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 11137 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11137 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Jaina vs State Of Kerala on 16 April, 2024

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                         PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
 TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL 2024/27TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                  CRL.MC NO.2180 OF 2024
    CRIME NO.1090/2012 OF MANNANCHERRY POLICE STATION,
                         ALAPPUZHA
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.1467 OF 2022 OF
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II(MOBILE), ALAPPUZHA
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3:

    1    JAINA, AGED 63 YEARS, D/O.JOSEPH,
         VAVAKKADU VEEDU, KALAVOOR VILLAGE,
         POLLETHAI (PO), ALAPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688522.

    2    JACKSON @ JINU, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.JENA,
         VAVAKKADU VEEDU, KALAVOOR VILLAGE,
         POLLETHAI (P.O),
         ALAPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688522.

    3    YESUDAS @ PRINCE, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.JAMES,
         VAVAKKADU VEEDU, KALAVOOR VILLAGE,
         POLLETHAI (PO), ALAPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688522.

         BY ADVS.
         ARUN BOSE
         V.M.JACOB
RESPONDENTS/STATE AND DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:

    1    STATE OF KERALA,
         REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
         HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULUM, PIN - 682031.

    2    THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
         MANNANCHERRY POLICE STATION, MANNANCHERRY,
         ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688012.

    3    MERCY @ MERCY JAMES, AGED 64 YEARS,
         W/O.JAMES.P.JOHN, PALLIPARAMBIL VEEDU,
         KALAVOOR VILLAGE, WARD NO.II,
         MARARIKULAM SOUTH PANCHAYATH, POLLETHAI (PO),
         ALAPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688522.
 Crl.M.C No.2180 of 2024
                            - 2 -

            BY ADVS.SRI.B.BIPIN

                   SRI.E.C.BINEESH,
                   LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


     THIS     CRIMINAL   MISC.    CASE   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION ON 16.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED
THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C No.2180 of 2024
                                - 3 -


                           O R D E R

Dated, this the 16th April, 2024

Petitioners are accused nos.1 to 3 in C.C.

No.1467/2022 of the Judicial First Class

Magistrate Court-II, Alappuzha. The offences

alleged are under Sections 447, 427, 294(b),

506(i) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The above Crl.M.C. has been filed seeking to

quash Annexure-A1 F.I.R in Crime No.1090/2012 of

Mannancherry police station, Annexure-A2 final

report in C.C.No.1467/2022 and all further

proceedings thereto against the petitioners.

Quashment is sought for on the premise that the

issues between the accused persons and the

defacto complainant (3rd respondent herein) have

been amicably settled and that the defacto

complainant is no more interested to prosecute

the matter as against the petitioners. Annexure-

A3 affidavit has been sworn to by the 3rd

respondent/defacto complainant stating inter alia

- 4 -

that she has no grievance against the petitioners

in connection with Crime No.1090/2012 and that

she has no intention to proceed with C.C.

No.1467/2022 of the Judicial First Class

Magistrate Court-II, Alapuzha, any more.

3. When this matter was moved, this Court

directed the learned Public Prosecutor to get

instructions, along with a signed statement of

the defacto complainant. The same is also filed,

wherein the Investigating Officer would report

that the defacto complainant is not willing any

more to continue the case against the

petitioners. Along with the said report,

Annexure-A1 signed statement of the defacto

complainant statement is also appended, wherein

also the above referred facts are reiterated.

4. In view of the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme

Court in B.S. Joshi & Ors v. State Of Haryana &

Anr [2003 (4) SCC 675] and Gian Singh v. State of

Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303], this Court finds that

- 5 -

no useful purpose is to be served by continuing

the prosecution as against the petitioners,

inasmuch as the defacto complainant had

unequivocally expressed her intention to withdraw

the criminal proceedings against the petitioners.

The issues involved in this crime are purely

private in nature, without in any way impacting

the society at large.

5. In the circumstances, this Crl.M.C. is

allowed and F.I.R. in Crime No.1090/2012 of

Mannancherry police station, Annexure-A2 final

report in the said crime and all further

proceedings in C.C.No.1467/2022 of the Judicial

First Class Magistrate Court-II, Alappuzha are

hereby quashed.

Sd/-

C.JAYACHANDRAN, JUDGE

ww

- 6 -

PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.

1090/2012 OF THE MANNANCHERRY POLICE STATION, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT.

ANNEXURE A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.1090/2012 IN C.C.NO.1467/2022 ON THE FILES OF THE HON'BLE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, ALAPUZHA.

ANNEXURE A3 AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT DATED 17.02.2024.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter