Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suresh Kumar S vs The Superintendent Of Police
2024 Latest Caselaw 11126 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11126 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Suresh Kumar S vs The Superintendent Of Police on 16 April, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                        PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
                           &
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL 2024/27TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                WP(CRL.) NO. 426 OF 2024
PETITIONERS:

    1    SURESH KUMAR S.,
         AGED 49 YEARS,
         S/O SIVAN NAIR,
         CHARUVILA THAZHATHIL,
         CHEMMENTHOOR,
         PUNALUR P. O ,
         PUNALUR VILLAGE,
         KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691305
    2    SARITHA S.,
         AGED 38 YEARS,
         W/O SURESH KUMAR S.,
         CHARUVILA THAZHATHIL ,
         CHEMMENTHOOR,
         PUNALUR P.O.,
         PUNALUR VILLAGE,
         KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691305

         BY ADV. AJEESH K.SASI


RESPONDENTS:

    1    THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
         KOLLAM RURAL,
         PIN - 691001
    2    THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
         PUNALUR,
         KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691305
    3    CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
         PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT,
         PIN - 691305
    4    STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
         PUNALUR POLICE STATION,
         KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691305
 W.P.(Crl.) No.426/2024
                           :2:


    5    STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
         KUNNIKKODE POLICE STATION,
         KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691508
    6    PRAVEEN,
         AGED 21 YEARS,
         S/O PRABHAKARAN,
         PRAMOD BHAVAN, PUNALUR P.O.,
         PUNALUR,
         KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691305
    7    PRABHAKARAN,
         PRAMOD BHAVAN, PUNALUR P.O.,
         PUNALUR,
         KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691305
    8    REMA,
         W/O. PRABHAKARAN,
         PRAMOD BHAVAN, PUNALUR P.O.,
         PUNALUR,
         KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691305

         BY ADVS.
         SMT. VIDHYA KURIAKOSE, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
         SRI.A.SANIL KUMAR - R6, R7 & R8

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 16.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(Crl.) No.426/2024
                                     :3:




            N. NAGARESH & P.M. MANOJ, JJ.
           -------------------------------------------------------
                   W.P.(Crl.) No.426 of 2024
           -------------------------------------------------------
              Dated this the 16th day of April, 2024


                          JUDGMENT

Nagaresh, J.

The petitioners are before this Court seeking to

issue a writ of Habeas Corpus and to set at liberty their

daughter Akhila S., aged 18 years.

2. The petitioners state that their daughter was born

on 30.03.2006 and she went missing since 31.03.2024, on

the very next date of attaining majority. The petitioners

allege that the daughter is in the illegal custody of the 6 th

respondent, who claims to be her lover.

3. The petitioners made complaint in this regard

before the Police Authorities. However, no investigation has

been conducted by the Police regarding the same even after

the complaint. She was only traced out and let go with the

6th respondent even by the Jurisdictional Magistrate.

4. It is in such circumstances that the petitioners

have filed this writ petition seeking to direct respondents 1 to

5 to produce the body of Akhila S., the daughter of the

petitioners before this Court and set her at liberty.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents.

6. We have interacted with the daughter of the

petitioners, who is present in the Court today.

7. The daughter of the petitioners, the alleged

detenue, would submit that she has attained the age of

majority and she has married the 6 th respondent under local

customs. Both of them have submitted a Notice of Intended

Marriage also before the Department of Registration,

Kerala.

8. Considering the statements made by the alleged

detenue, who has attained the age of majority, we find that

there is no illegal detention of the alleged detenue by

respondents 6 to 8 or one among them. In view of the

above, the writ petition fails.

The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH, JUDGE

Sd/-

P.M.MANOJ, JUDGE SR

APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 426/2024

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 4-4-

                   2024   SUBMITTED   BEFORE    THE  3RD
                   RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P2         TRUE COPY OF THE SECONDARY SCHOOL

LIVING CERTIFICATE WITH REGISTER NO. 471370 DATED 15-6-2022.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST DATED 15-6-2023.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter