Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Harish M vs Smitha K
2024 Latest Caselaw 11104 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11104 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Harish M vs Smitha K on 16 April, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                        PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
                            &
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL 2024/27TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                 OP (FC) NO. 267 OF 2024
  AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA.2& 3 OF 2024 IN OP NO.494 OF
            2024 OF FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM

PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PETITONER:

         HARISH M.,
         AGED 56 YEARS,
         S/o.SREEKUMARAN,
         KISMET, ELAPULLY,
         PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678622

         BY ADVS.
         V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR
         P.R.REENA


RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

    1    SMITHA K.,
         AGED 51,
         D/o.LATE SUKUMARAN NAIR,
         KANNATHKALAM VEEDU,
         VENGASSERY POST,
         OTTAPPALAM TALUK, PIN-679516

    2    SUKUMARI,
         AGED 75,
         W/O LATE SUKUMARAN NAIR,
         KANNATHKALAM VEEDU,
         VENGASSERY POST,
         OTTAPPALAM TALUK, PIN 679516
 OP(FC) No.267/2024
                             :2:


     3     VIJAYARAGHAVAN,
           S/o.NARAYANAN MENON,
           KANNATHKALAM VEEDU,
           VENGASSERY POST,
           OTTAPPALAM TALUK, PIN-679516

     THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP       FOR
ADMISSION ON 16.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 OP(FC) No.267/2024
                                         :3:



                N. NAGARESH & P.M. MANOJ, JJ.

           `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                       O.P. (FC) No.267 of 2024

           `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                 Dated this the 16th day of April, 2024

                             JUDGMENT

~~~~~~~~~

Nagaresh, J.

The petitioner, who is the husband of the

1st respondent, has filed this OP(FC) seeking to direct the

Family Court, Ottapalam to pass orders on Exts.P6 and P7

IAs within a time fixed by this Court and before proceeding

with the trial in OP. No.288/2021 and OP. No.494/2022 of

the Family Court, Ottapalam.

2. The 1st respondent-wife filed Ext.P1 OP

No.288/2021 in the Family Court, Ottapalam seeking

divorce. The petitioner filed Ext.P2 objection to the OP.

3. The petitioner filed Ext.P3 OP No.1212/2021 in

the Family Court, Palakkad for return of the amount paid by

the petitioner to the 1st respondent, her brother and father-

in-law. The said OP No.1212/2021 was transferred to the

Family Court, Ottapalam and re-numbered as OP

No.494/2022. The 1st respondent has filed objection to

Ext.P3 OP No.494/2022.

4. The petitioner states that Ext.P3 OP for return of

amount was posted before the Family Court on 11.10.2023.

The Family Court adjourned the case to 07.12.2023. On

07.12.2023, when the case was taken up, the petitioner

submitted that a copy of the counter affidavit is not received.

However, the Family Court, without taking into account the

said submission, listed Ext.P3 OP for trial to be held on

23.03.2024.

5. The petitioner states that he was served with a

copy of the counter affidavit only on 23.03.2024. The Family

Court, even without any application made by the parties,

ordered joint trial of Exts.P1 and P3 OPs. On 08.04.2024,

the petitioner filed IA No.1/2024 for removing the case from

the list, IA No.2/2024 for receiving documents relating to

transfer of amount and IA No.3/2024 to receive witness list.

6. On 11.04.2024, the Family Court dismissed IA

No.1/2024 without assigning any reason. IA Nos.2 and 3 of

2024 were posted for objection of the respondents to

12.04.2024. On 12.04.2024, the Family Court allowed IA

No.4/2024 filed by the 1 st respondent to receive certain

documents. The petitioner was not even given an

opportunity to file objection. The Family Court accepted the

proof affidavit of the 1st respondent also on 12.04.2024.

7. The petitioner states that the Family Court has

not passed orders on IA Nos.2 and 3 of 2024. The

petitioner has to cross-examine witnesses. Effective cross-

examination can be done only after documents are

accepted. Without accepting the documents, the case now

stands posted to 17.04.2024. The petitioner therefore seeks

to direct the Family Court to give sufficient and effective

opportunity to cross-examine witnesses after accepting the

documents produced by the petitioner.

8. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner.

9. Ext.P3 OP No.494/2022 is filed by the petitioner

for return of the amount. A counter affidavit to the OP was

filed by the 1st respondent only on 23.03.2024. On that day

only, the petitioner realised that the 1st respondent has

denied the receipt of money sent by the petitioner from

abroad through money exchange institution. In view of the

denial by the 1st respondent, the petitioner is forced to

adduce documents and examine witnesses to prove

payment of money. The petitioner therefore filed IA

No.2/2024 for receiving documents and IA No.3/2024 to

receive witness list. Without passing any orders, the case is

posted to 17.04.2024 for trial. The petitioner states that

unless the documents and list of witnesses are accepted,

the petitioner will be put to prejudice.

10. It is to be noted that the Family Court has not

rejected IA Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 filed by the petitioner. The

IAs stand posted to 17.04.2024. It cannot be presumed that

the Family Court will reject the IAs filed by the petitioner.

Therefore, no interference is warranted in that regard, at this

stage of the proceedings.

11. Even if the Family Court rejects the interim

application filed by the petitioner, the petitioner has

opportunity to challenge the orders passed in the IA and if

final judgment is delivered, the petitioner can challenge the

final judgment. The original petitions filed by the petitioner

and the 1st respondent are of the year 2021. Those petitions

will have to be disposed of expeditiously without further

delay.

For all the above facts, we find no justification in

granting any relief to the petitioner in this OP(FC). The

OP(FC) is therefore dismissed.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH, JUDGE

Sd/-

P.M. MANOJ, JUDGE

aks/17.04.2024

APPENDIX OF O.P.(FC) No.267/2024

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF OP NO.288/2021 DATED 20.04.2021 FILED BEFORE THE FAMILIY COURT, OTTAPPALAM.

Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN IN OP NO.288 OF 2021 BEFORE HTE FAMILY COURT OTTAPALAM DATED 11.10.2023.

Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF OP NO.1212/221 FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT PALAKKAD WHICH WAS TRANSFERRED TO OTTAPPALAM FAMILY COURT AND RENUMBERED AS OP.494/2022.

Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF OBJECTION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN OP NO.494 OF 2022 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT OTTAPPALAM DATED 13.10.2023.

Exhibit-P5 TRUE COPY OF I.A NO.1/2024 IN OP NO.494/2022 DATED 06.4.224 FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM. Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF I.A.NO.2/2024 IN OP NO.494/2022 DATED 06.04.2024 FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT.

Exhibit-P7 TRUE COPY OF I.A.No.3 OF 2024 IN OP No.494/2022 DATED 06.04.2024 FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM. Exhibit-P8 TRUE COPY OF I.A No.4 OF 2024 IN OP No.494/2024 DATED 12.04.2024 FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter