Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Alex V.C vs Saramma Simon
2024 Latest Caselaw 10495 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10495 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Alex V.C vs Saramma Simon on 11 April, 2024

Author: Raja Vijayaraghavan

Bench: V Raja Vijayaraghavan

                THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                          PRESENT
     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
                             &
           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1946
                    OP (FC) NO. 174 OF 2024
 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN OP NO.575 OF 2019 OF
                 FAMILY COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA

PETITIONER/S:

          ALEX V.C., AGED 46 YEARS
          S/O LATE CHERIAN VARGHESE, VAKKAYIL HOUSE,
          CHATHANTHARA PO, KOLLAMULA,
          PATHANAMTHITTA (DIST), PIN - 686510

          BY ADV GERRY DOUGLES S.


RESPONDENT/S:

    1     SARAMMA SIMON, AGED 40 YEARS
          D/O SIMON, PALLIYATH KALAYIL VEEDU, ERAM PO,
          MALAYALAPPUZHA VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK
          PATHANAMTHITTA DIST., PIN - 689664

    2     SIMON P. C., AGED 62 YEARS
          S/O CHERIAN, PALLIYATH KALAYIL VEEDU, ERAM PO,
          MALAYALAPPUZHA VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK
          PATHANAMTHITTA DIST., PIN - 689664

    3     ELYAMMA SIMON, AGED 60 YEARS
          W/O SIMON P. C., PALLIYATH KALAYIL VEEDU, ERAM PO,
          MALAYALAPPUZHA VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK
          PATHANAMTHITTA DIST., PIN - 689664

          BY ADV K.N.RADHAKRISHNAN (THIRUVALLA)
                                  2

OP(FC) No.174 of 2024



OTHER PRESENT:

               SRI K N RADHAKRISHNAN, FOR PARTY RESP.

     THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 11.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                                        3

OP(FC) No.174 of 2024




                                 JUDGMENT

Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.

The petitioner herein is the petitioner in O.P. No.575 of 2019 on the

file of the Family Court, Pathanamthitta. The aforesaid petition has been

filed seeking permanent custody of his minor child, who is now aged 12

years.

2. According to the petitioner, Ext. P2 application has been filed

before the Family Court seeking interim custody of the child and the same

is pending consideration. He requests that the same be ordered to be

considered expeditiously.

3. This Court by order dated 13.03.2024 called for a report

from the Family Court as to the time frame within which the matter can

be disposed of.

4. In the report it is stated that there is no Presiding Officer in

the Family Court, Pathanamthitta, and the Family Court, Thiruvalla is in

additional charge. The same officer is also holding additional charge of

Family Court, Adoor as well. However, in the report, it is stated that the

application filed for interim custody can be heard and disposed of on or

before 06.06.2024.

5. At this stage, the counsel appearing for the petitioner

submits that he has had no opportunity to interact with his daughter and

requests that until the matter is heard and disposed of, an interim

arrangement be made.

6. Sri. K.N. Radhakrishnan, the counsel appearing for the

respondent, vehemently opposed the submissions.

7. Having considered the submissions advanced, we are of the

view that being the father, the petitioner is entitled to day custody of the

child during Saturdays till the application is heard and disposed of by the

Family Court.

8. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, there will be a

direction to the 1st respondent to produce the child before the

Sheristadar, Family Court, Pathanamthitta at 10:00 a.m. every Saturday.

The child shall be returned to the custody of the 1st respondent at

4:00 p.m. on the same day at the same venue. On Tuesdays and

Thursdays, the petitioner is permitted to interact with his daughter

through video calls for 15 minutes between 7:00 p.m. and 8:00 pm.

While considering the Original Petition and the application, the Family

Court shall independently assess the matter and shall not be tied down to

the directions issued by this as an interim measure.

The Family Court shall make an endeavor to implement the

undertaking given before this Court as per the report dated 22.3.2024.

sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE

sd/-

P.M.MANOJ JUDGE das

APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 174/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF O.P. NO. 575/2019 ON THE FILES OF THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF IA NO. 1/2022 IN O.P. NO.

575/2019 ON THE FILES OF THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter