Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

George K. M vs The Manager, Kerala State ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 10371 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10371 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

George K. M vs The Manager, Kerala State ... on 11 April, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
     THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1946
                       WP(C) NO. 14478 OF 2024
PETITIONERS:

     1     GEORGE K. M.,
           AGED 65 YEARS
           S/O MATHAI, KOLLAMPARAMBIL (H),
           PARATHANAM P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686512
     2     GIJIN GEORGE,
           AGED 39 YEARS
           S/O GEORGE K. M, KOLLAMPARAMBIL (H),
           PARATHANAM P.O., KOTTAYAM,
           PIN - 686512

           BY ADVS.
           AISWARYA E J VETTIKOMPIL
           CHRISTINE MATHEW
           ABESH ALOSIOUS
           SEN C PUTHUPPARAMPIL


RESPONDENTS:

     1     THE MANAGER, KERALA STATE CO.,-OPERATIVE BANK,
           KOTTAYAM REGIONAL OFFICE
           KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
           KOTTAYAM REGIONAL OFFICE,P.B. NO. 140,
           CENTRAL JUNCTION, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686001
     2     MANAGER, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
           MUNDAKKAYAM BRANCH,
           KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686513
     3     AUTHORIZED OFFICER, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
           KOTTAYAM REGIONAL OFFICE, P.B. NO. 140,
           CENTRAL JUNCTION, KOTTAYAM,
           PIN - 686001

           SRI.ATHUL SHAJI


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) No.14478 Of 2024
                               2


                         JUDGMENT

Dated this the 11th day of April, 2024

The petitioners have approached this Court aggrieved by

the coercive proceedings for recovery of financial advance

made by the Kerala State Co-operative Bank to the

petitioners, invoking the provisions of the Securitisation and

Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of

Security Interest Act, 2002.

2. The Bank paid ₹20 lakhs to the petitioners as

Ordinary Loans. The petitioners state that though the

petitioners made remittances promptly during the initial

repayment period of the financial advance, they could not pay

the repayment installments promptly later due to Covid-19

pandemic. The repayment of loan fell into arrears. It

happened due to reasons beyond the control of the

petitioners.

WP(C) No.14478 Of 2024

3. Though the petitioners requested the Bank to

permit the petitioners to repay the overdue amounts in easy

monthly installments, the Bank authorities were not yielding.

The authorities, instead started coercive proceedings invoking

the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of

Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,

2002 and the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 and

issued Exts.P1 to P3 notices.

4. The petitioners state that they are still in a position

to clear the overdue amounts towards the loan, if sufficient

time is given to clear the dues in easy monthly installments. If

the respondents are permitted to continue with the coercive

proceedings and auction the secured assets provided by the

petitioners, they will be put to untold hardship and loss.

5. Standing Counsel entered appearance on behalf of

the Bank and denied all the statements made by the

petitioners. The petitioners committed default in repaying the WP(C) No.14478 Of 2024

loans.

6. The Bank repeatedly reminded the petitioners and

required them to clear the dues. The petitioners deliberately

omitted to do so. In the circumstances, the Bank had no other

go than to proceed against the petitioners invoking the

provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of

Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,

2002. The impugned Exts.P1 to P3 notices were issued in

these circumstances. The petitioners have not advanced any

legal reasons to thwart the coercive proceedings initiated by

the Bank.

7. The Standing Counsel, however, submitted that if

the petitioners are ready and willing to make a substantial

payment soon and remit the balance overdue amount

immediately thereafter, a short breathing time can be granted

to the petitioners to clear the dues. The Standing Counsel

submitted that the outstanding amount due to the Bank from

the petitioners as on 08.04.2024 is ₹46,66,196/- and the WP(C) No.14478 Of 2024

overdue amount as on 08.04.2024 is ₹43,99,460/-.

8. I have heard the counsel for the petitioners and the

Standing Counsel representing the Bank.

9. The specific case of the petitioners is that the

petitioners have been making the repayment and maintaining

the loan account initially. The default in repayment of the loan

occurred lately due to reasons beyond the control of the

petitioners. The petitioners have provided substantial security

which will safeguard the interest of the Bank.

10. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am

inclined to dispose of the writ petition giving a short and

reasonable time to the petitioners to clear off the liability.

11. The writ petition is therefore disposed of with the

following directions:

(i) The petitioners shall remit ₹10 lakhs

within one month from today and the balance

overdue amount in ten consecutive and

equal monthly installments immediately WP(C) No.14478 Of 2024

thereafter along with accruing interest and

other Bank charges, if any.

(ii) If the petitioners commit default in

making payments as directed above, the

respondents will be at liberty to continue with

the coercive proceedings against the

petitioners in accordance with law.

(iii) The petitioners shall also pay current

EMIs along with the aforesaid payments.

(iv) If the petitioners make payments as

directed above, coercive proceedings, if any,

against the petitioners shall stand deferred.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE hmh WP(C) No.14478 Of 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14478/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 24.01.2024 OF THE KERALA STATE CO-

OPERATIVE BANK, KOTTAYAM REGIONAL OFFICE Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 24.01.2024 OF THE KERALA STATE CO-

OPERATIVE BANK, KOTTAYAM REGIONAL OFFICE Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER DATED 01-04-2024 TO FIRST PETITIONER AS PER THE ORDER OF THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, KOTTAYAM IN MC. NO:234/2024 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF DISCHARGE SHEET OF THE FIRST PETITIONER ISSUED BY MARY QUEENS MISSION HOSPITAL, KANJIRAPALLY DATED 31-01-2020 Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE OPHTHALMIC REPORT OF THE THREE YEAR OLD SON OF SECOND PETITIONER ISSUED BY LITTLE FLOWER HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE, ANGAMALY DATED 25-03-2021

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter