Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10174 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 April, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
Friday, the 5th day of April 2024 / 16th Chaithra, 1946
IA.NO.1/2024 IN RSA NO. 76 OF 2024
OS 264/2004 OF MUNSIFF COURT,PUNALUR
AS 20/2020 OF SUB COURT,PUNALUR
APPLICANT/APPELLANT:
R.RAVEENDRAN, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O RAGHAVAN, ANADHABHAVAN, (DEVI
BHAVAN), PULLAMCODE MURI, ARACKAL VILLAGE, EDAYAM P.O, PUNALUR
TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 532.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. THOMAS, AGED 94 YEARS, S/O GEEVARGHESE, THEKKEKKARA @ MAMOOTTIL
VEEDU, PULLAMCODE MURI, ARACKAL VILLAGE, PUNALUR TALUK. (DIED).
2. THOMAS JOHN, AGED 79 YEARS, MAMOOTTIL BUNGLOW, EDAYAM P.O, ARACKAL
VILLAGE, PUNALUR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 532.
3. C.K MARYKUTTY, AGED 76 YEARS, MAMOOTTIL BUNGLOW, EDAYAM P.O, ARACKAL
VILLAGE, PUNALUR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 532
4. MAMMEN THOMAS, AGED 69 YEARS, MAMOOTTIL BUNGLOW, EDAYAM P.O, ARACKAL
VILLAGE, PUNALUR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 532
5. JACOB THOMAS, AGED 66 YEARS, MAMOOTTIL BUNGLOW, EDAYAM P.O, ARACKAL
VILLAGE, PUNALUR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 532
6. JACOB GEORGE, AGED 47 YEARS, MAMOOTTIL BUNGLOW, EDAYAM P.O, ARACKAL
VILLAGE, PUNALUR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 532
7. JIJI GEORGE, AGED 47 YEARS, MAMOOTTIL BUNGLOW, EDAYAM P.O, ARACKAL
VILLAGE, PUNALUR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691532
8. REJI GEORGE, AGED 43 YEARS, MAMOOTTIL BUNGLOW, EDAYAM P.O, ARACKAL
VILLAGE, PUNALUR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 532.
9. SEETHAMMAL, AGED 67 YEARS, D/O THANKAMMAL, SURESH BHAVAN,
NEELESWARAM MURI, KOTTARAKKARA VILLAGE , KOTTARAKKA TALUK,
NEELESWARAM P.O, KOLLAM DIST., PIN - 691 506.
10. FR. JOHN PUTHANVEETTIL, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O UNNOONNI, PUTHENVEEDU,
THEKKUMPURAM MURI, PUTHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, PUTHOOR P.O,
KOLLAM DT. , PIN - 691 507.
Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to stay the operation
and execution of the judgment and decree dated 07.08.2023 in AS.No.20/2020
of the Subordinate Judge's Court,Punalur till the disposal of this Second
Appeal.
This Application coming on for orders upon perusing the application
and the affidavit filed in support thereof, and upon hearing the arguments
of M/S.O.V.MANIPRASAD, JOSE ANTONY, HARIKRISHNAN P., Advocates for the
petitioner, the court passed the following:
R.S.A.Nos.69 & 76 of 2024
..1..
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J.
---------------------------------------
R.S.A.Nos.69 & 76 of 2024
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 5th day of April, 2024
COMMON ORDER
Admit. Issue notice to the respondents on the
following substantial questions of law:
(1) In reversing the judgment of the trial
court, whether the First Appellate Court
was justified in construing Exts.A1 & A2
as security documents and not sale
deeds?
(2) Whether suit for declaration of title
and recovery of possession is
maintainable, when the plaintiff rests
his claim on an oral agreement for
re-conveyance of the property? Whether
the plaintiff should have filed a suit
for specific performance?
R.S.A.Nos.69 & 76 of 2024
..2..
I.A.No.1/2024 in R.S.A.No.69/2024 & I.A.No.1/2024 in R.S.A.No.76/2024
The execution of the judgment and decree impugned
will stand stayed for a period of two months.
Post on 06.06.2024
Sd/-
C. JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE TR
05-04-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!