Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9422 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2023
WP(C) No.29071/2023 1/4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
Friday, the 1st day of September 2023 / 10th Bhadra, 1945
WP(C) NO. 29071 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
RAVINDRANATHAN C., AGED 53 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANAN, CHURATHIL HOUSE,
THRIKKADERI P.O., PALAKKAD., PIN - 679502
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION P.O., PALAKKAD.,
PIN - 678001
2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THRIKKADERI I VILLAGE, THRIKKADERI P.O.,
PALAKKAD, PIN - 679502
3. THE TAHSILDAR, OTTAPALAM, OTTPALAM P.O., PALAKKAD, PIN - 678101
4. SREE GOKULAM CHITS AND FINANCE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, DIVISIONAL
OFFICE, SANJOS TOWERS, OPP. KSRTC BUS STAND, SHORNUR ROAD, PALAKKAD,
PIN - 678001
Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P3, pending the
consideration of the above writ petition, in the interest of justice.
This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and
the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of
M/S. I.DINESH MENON & L.RAJESH NARAYAN, Advocates for the petitioner, the
court passed the following:
WP(C) No.29071/2023 2/4
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
------------------------------------
W.P(C.) No. 29071 of 2023
------------------------------------
Dated this the 1st day of September, 2023
ORDER
The petitioner has approached this Court challenging
Ext.P3 warrant issued by the Trial Court to recover the fine
pursuant to Ext.P1 judgment in C.C No.327/2009 dated
14.12.2010, which has been confirmed in Crl.A No.733/2010
as per judgment dated 22.05.2013. Petitioner submits that
he was totally unaware of the above judgment, as the same
was not intimated to him by the counsel. Petitioner submits
that he has already taken steps to file a Revision Petition
before this Court challenging the same. A copy of the same
is produced as Ext.P4. The petitioner submits that he will
move the said Revision Petition at the earliest, and seek for
an interim order in the meanwhile contending that, if Ext.P3
is allowed to be executed, petitioner will put to serious
prejudice.
Considering the fact that the petitioner has already
taken steps to file the Revision Petition and the same will be WP(C) No.29071/2023 3/4
W.P.(C) No.29071 of 2023
coming for consideration only after re-opening of the
Court, I am of the opinion that some breathing time can
be granted to the petitioner so as to enable him to move
the Revision Petition and seek for appropriate interim
order in the same. But taking into consideration the fact
that the Appellate Court judgment, Ext.P2, is dated
22.05.2013, the same shall only be on conditions. There
will be an interim order as prayed for, for a period of
one month, on condition that the petitioner deposit an
amount of Rs.1,50,000/- before the Trial Court within a
period of ten days.
Sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM
JUDGE
AP
WP(C) No.29071/2023 4/4
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 29071/2023
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM NO.44 FOR WARRANT FOR RECOVERY OF
FINE DATED NIL ISSUED BY JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE, PALAKKAD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!