Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10141 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 30TH BHADRA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 26058 OF 2023
PETITIONER/S:
ANITHA SANAL, AGED 59 YEARS, D/O LATE T.V RAJAPPAN PILLAI
DIVYA HOUSE, THEKKENADA, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN -
686141
BY ADV KAVERY S THAMPI
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE DEPUTY TAHASILDAR (RR)VAIKOM TALUK OFFICE FIRST FLOOR,
MINI CIVIL STATION, WEST GATE ROAD, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM
DISTRICT, PIN - 686141
2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER NADUVILLE VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686141
3 THE VAIKOM MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPAL OFFICE, WEST GATE ROAD
VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
PIN - 686141
4 THE SECRETARYVAIKOM MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPAL OFFICE, WEST
GATE ROAD VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686141
5 THE FINANCE STANDING COMMITTEEVAIKOM MUNICIPALITY
MUNICIPAL OFFICE, WEST GATE ROAD VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM
DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER., PIN - 686141
BY ADVS.GOVERNMENT PLEADER; Sreekala A SC r3 & r5
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.26058/2023
-2-
JUDGMENT
The present writ petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India has been filed impugning Exts.P8, P9 and
P9(a).
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in
view of the provisions of Section 282 read with Section 539 of
the Kerala Municipality Act 1994, no tax demand can be
enforced after the expiration of a period of three years from
the date on which the distraint could have first been made, a
suit could have first been instituted, or prosecution could have
first been commenced. She, therefore, submits that the
demand for building tax prior to the Assessment Year 2018-19
is barred by the limitation, as provided under Section 539 read
with Section 282 of the Kerala Municipality Act.
3. Ms A Sreekala, learned Counsel for the 3 rd and the
5th respondents, has submitted that the demand notices or the W.P.(C) No.26058/2023
tax due were sent time and again. Despite the demand notices,
the petitioner failed to remit the tax. She, therefore, submits
that the petitioner is liable to pay the tax as per Exts.P8 and
P9.
4. I have considered the submissions advanced by the
Counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.
5. Section 539 of the Kerala Municipality Act
contemplates that the tax prior to three years cannot be
collected by putting a distraint order. Section 282 of the
Kerala Municipality Act provides that the assessment could be
done within four years from the date on which such person
should have been assessed. Reading the provisions of Sections
539 and 282 conjointly, it would be evident that the assessment
for tax for a period could be done within four years from the
last date of that Assessment Year. Regarding the Assessment
Year 2011-12, the notice could have been issued within four W.P.(C) No.26058/2023
years for making the assessment. No such notices were issued,
and only the impugned order in Ext.P8 has been passed in
respect of Assessment Years from 2011-12 to 2022-23.
5.1 It would be apt to reproduce Sections 539 and 282 of
the Kerala Municipality Act, which reads as follows:
"539. Limitation for recovery of dues - (1) No distraint shall be made, no suit shall be instituted and no prosecution shall be commenced in respect of any sum due to a Municipality under this Act after the expiration of a period of three years from the date on which distraint might first have been made, suit might first have been instituted, or prosecution might first have been commenced, as the case may be, in respect of such sum:
Provided that in the case of assessments made under Section 282, the said period of three years shall be computed from the date on which distraint might have been made, suit instituted, or prosecution commenced after the assessment under the said section shall have been made.
(2) Where any amount due to the Municipality has been barred by limitation under sub-section (1) due to the default of not taking steps at the appropriate time, and it is found in a lawful enquiry that it was lost due to the default of any W.P.(C) No.26058/2023
officer or officers, the amount so lost to the Municipality shall be realised with twelve per cent interest thereon form such officer or officers.
282. Power to assess in case of escape from assessment - Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act or the rules made thereunder, where for any reason a person liable to pay any tax or fees leviable under this Chapter has escaped assessment in any half-year, the Secretary may at any time within four years from the date on which such person should have been assessed, serve on him a notice assessing to the tax or fee due and demanding payment thereof within fifteen days from the date of such service and thereupon the provisions of this Act and the Rules made thereunder shall, so far as may be, apply as if the assessment was made in the half-year to which the tax or fee relates"
5.2 Considering the aforesaid fact, I am of the view that
no assessment could have been passed in respect of the
building tax prior to the period 2018-19. Thus, the present
writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner
to pay the tax from 2018-19 till 2023-24. For the prior period
from 2011-12 to 2017-18, the demand for tax is quashed. W.P.(C) No.26058/2023
5.3 The Municipality is directed to issue a fresh notice
to the petitioner for demand of tax within a period of fifteen
days for the period from 2018-19 up to date. If the petitioner
has paid any tax for this period, that shall be considered and
given credit.
With aforesaid, the present writ petition is allowed in
part.
Sd/-
DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE
jjj W.P.(C) No.26058/2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26058/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT NO: 26/11-12 DATED 07.05.2011 ISSUED IN FAVOR OF PETITIONER AND SMT. DEVI PARVATHY FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT MUNICIPALITY
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO: R1-1407/12 DATED 17.03.2012 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER AND HER SISTER
Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND HER SISTER DEVI PARVATHI WITH THE 5TH RESPONDENT ON 16.04.2012
Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT NO: 3229 DATED 16.04.2012 ISSUED FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT MUNICIPALITY
Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER FROM 3RD RESPONDENT MUNICIPALITY FOR REMITTING RS. 1654/-, THE HALF- YEARLY TAX AMOUNT
Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF NOTICE NO: R1-8232/2022 DATED 26.11.2022 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER AND HER SISTER
Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED NIL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AND HER SISTER WITH THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF VAIKOM MUNICIPALITY
Exhibit P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO: MTF NO: 31 DATED 23.01.2023 ISSUED BY THE VAIKOM MUNICIPALITY
Exhibit P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO: RRC NO:
2023/2724/05 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER AND HER SISTER UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE KERALA REVENUE W.P.(C) No.26058/2023
RECOVERY ACT 1968 DATED 15.05.2023 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Exhibit P9(a) A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO: RRC NO:
2023/2724/05 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER AND HER SISTER UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY ACT 1968 DATED 15.05.2023 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Exhibit P10 A TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER AND HER SISTER FROM NADUVILLE VILLAGE OFFICE DATED 27.05.2023
RESPONDENT EXHIBITS
Exhibit R4(a) True photocopy of office copy of the demand notices No.9468. 9469. 9470 dated 02.07.2019 from this respondent to the petitioner's father, Late Rajappan Pillai
Exhibit R4(b) True photocopy of the demand notices No.9489 dated 05.07.2019
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!