Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5704 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 May, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 26TH VAISAKHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 15849 OF 2023
PETITIONER
SHYLA
AGED 55 YEARS
W/O SUDARSAN, AADITHYA HOUSE, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM, PIN
- 683542
BY ADV K.C.VINCENT
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA,
PIN - 686669
3 THE TAHSILDAR (LAND RECORDS)
KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, PERUMBAVOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM,
PIN - 683543
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
PERUMBAVOOR, PERUMBAVOOR P.O, PIN - 683542
SMT.DEVI SHRI R.-GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
16.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.15849 OF 2023
2
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is before this Court aggrieved by the
omission of the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar in entertaining Ext.P3
Form-A application submitted by the petitioner for reassessment
of rate of Basic Tax on land and for making necessary entries in
the Basic Tax Register.
2. The petitioner is owner of 4.89 Ares of property in
Re-Survey No.105/16 in Block No.18 of Perumbavoor Village,
Kunnathunadu Taluk in Ernakulam District. The petitioner
approached the Revenue Divisional Officer invoking the
provisions of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967 seeking to
permit to use the land for non-agricultural purposes. The
Revenue Divisional Officer passed Ext.P2 order under Clause 6
of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967 permitting to use the
land for non-agricultural purposes.
WP(C) NO.15849 OF 2023
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though
Ext.P2 order was passed under the Kerala Land Utilisation
Order, 1967 in the year 2015, the land of the petitioner is not re-
assessed for fixing rate of Basic Tax and the property of the
petitioner is still described as paddy land in the Revenue
records. The petitioner submitted Ext.P3 application invoking
Section 6(3) of the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961 seeking to re-
assess the Basic Tax and to make necessary entries in the
Basic Tax Register. The Tahsildar, however, has not passed
any orders on the application. Hence, the petitioner has
approached this Court.
4. The Government Pleader entered appearance on
behalf of the respondents and resisted the writ petition. The
Government Pleader controverted all the material allegations
made by the petitioner in the writ petition. It is submitted that
Ext.P2 proceedings are of the year 2015. The veracity and the
genuineness of Ext.P2 proceedings under the Kerala Land
Utilisation Order, 1967 are liable to be verified. The present WP(C) NO.15849 OF 2023
status of the land will also have to be ascertained, before
reassessment of Basic Tax under the Kerala Land Tax Act,
1961.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
the learned Government Pleader representing the respondents.
6. This Court has considered the issue of reassessment of
land tax on the basis of the orders obtained under the Kerala
Land Utilisation Order, 1967 in the judgment in Mary Abraham
v. State of Kerala and others [2020 (4) KLT 448]. This Court
held that once enabling order is passed under Rule 6(2) of the
Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967 permitting conversion of the
land, then the earlier entries in the BTR showing the land as
Nilam, Paddy Land, etc. will become superfluous and redundant
and the competent Revenue officials like the Tahsildar are
obliged under law to make a fresh assessment of the property
under Section 6A of the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961.
7. A Division Bench of this Court also considered the issue
in District Collector, Ernakulam and others v. Fr.Jose WP(C) NO.15849 OF 2023
Uppani and others [2020 (4) KLT 612] and the Division Bench
held that when an applicant has secured orders under the
Kerala Land Utiliation Order prior to the cut-off date on which
Section 27A was introduced to the Kerala Conservation of
Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, the competent Revenue
officials are bound to consider the subsequent application
submitted under the provisions of the Kerala Land Tax Act,
1961.
8. As the nature of the land of the petitioner has been
permitted to be changed pursuant to passing of a statutory
order under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967, the
competent authority is bound to re-assess the rate of Basic Tax
in respect of the land and to make necessary entries in the
Basic Tax Register, if necessary, after verifying the
veracity/genuineness of the permission obtained under the
Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967 produced by the petitioner.
The writ petition is therefore allowed. The 3 rd respondent-
Tahsildar is directed to consider Ext.P3 Form-A application WP(C) NO.15849 OF 2023
submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, and pass
appropriate orders thereon within a period of two months. The
3rd respondent-Tahsildar shall advert to the judgment of this
Court in Sealand Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Revenue Divisional
Officer, Fort Kochi and others reported in [2020 (4) KHC 764]
while taking a decision.
sd/-
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE hmh WP(C) NO.15849 OF 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15849/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 02.06.2021 RELATING TO THE PROPERTIES OF THE PETITIONER Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO. NO.
5560/15/K.DIS. DATED 26.08.2015 OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION IN FORM A WITH RECEIPT DATED 05.04.2023 Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.(C) NO. 38833 OF 2022 DATED 02.12.2022
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!