Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4204 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 11441 OF 2023
PETITIONERS:
1 RAJEEVAN
AGED 42 YEARS
S/O CHANDRAN, THORATTIL HOUSE, VADAKKUMURI DESOM,
VARANTHARAPPILLY VILLAGE, CHALAKUDY TALUK,
THRISSUR, PIN - 680306
2 SHARADHA
AGED 67 YEARS
W/O CHANDRAN, THORATTIL HOUSE, VADAKKUMURI DESOM,
VARANTHARAPPILLY VILLAGE, CHALAKUDY TALUK,
THRISSUR, PIN - 680306
BY ADV RAJESH CHAKYAT
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE JOINT REGISTRAR FOR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY
(GENERAL)COLLECTORATE, CIVIL LINE, AYYANTHOLE
,THRISSUR, PIN - 680003
2 THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE
SOCIETY( GENERAL)
AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680003
3 THE SPECIAL SALES OFFICER
KUTTANELLUR SCB GROUP, OFFICER OF THE ASSISTANT
REGISTRAR OFFICE (GENERAL), THRISSUR, PIN - 680014
4 KUTTANELLUR SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.758
KUTTANELLUR.P.O., THRISSUR. REPRESENTED BY IT
SECRETARY, PIN - 680014
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT. C S SHEEJA (SR GP)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C)No.11441/2023 2
JUDGMENT
The 1st petitioner availed a loan from the 4th respondent Bank. The
2nd petitioner is the surety. On default being committed, proceedings were
initiated against the petitioners under the provisions of the Kerala Co-
operative Societies Act, 1969 and an award was obtained determining the
amount due from the petitioners. The petitioners did not partake in the
proceedings and the award was set ex parte. The petitioners have filed
Ext.P2 application for setting aside the ex parte order, Ext.P3 application
for condoning the delay and Ext.P4 application for seeking stay of
proceedings.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the
3rd respondent before whom Exts.P2, P3 and P4 are pending may be
directed to consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. It is
also submitted that only a demand notice has been issued pursuant to the
award and no further proceedings for execution have been taken. It is also
pointed out that 3rd respondent was also the Arbitrator, who passed the
award in this case.
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners
and the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1
and 2, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of without
notice to respondents 3 and 4.
Accordingly, this writ petition will stand disposed of directing the 3rd
respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P2, P3 and P4
applications, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of
hearing to the petitioners and to the 4 th respondent, within a period of two
months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Till
orders are passed on Exts.P2, P3 and P4, further proceedings for execution
of the award in question shall be kept in abeyance. It is made clear that
orders on merits need be issued on Exts.P2 and P4 only if the 3 rd
respondent finds sufficient reason to condone the delay in filing the
application for setting aside the ex parte award.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE acd
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11441/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 17.03.2023
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 18.03.2023 TO SET ASIDE EXPARTE AWARD FILED IN A.R.C.NO. 365/2020 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT
Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 18.03.2023 FOR CONDONE THE DELAY IN FLING PETITION TO SET ASIDE EXPARTE AWARD IN A.R.C. NO. 365/2020 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT
Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 18.03.2023 FOR STAY THE RECOVERY PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO AWARD IN A.R.C.NO.365/2020 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!