Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3606 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 8TH CHAITHRA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 1668 OF 2013
PETITIONER:
NIDHIN P K
AGED 20 YEARS
S/O. SREENIVASAN, PALLOTTUKANDY HOUSE, CHELIYA.P.O.,
KOILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
(NOW MENTALLY ILL REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER AND NEXT
FRIEND SREENIVASAN, AGED 52 YEARS,
S/O. RAMANKUTTY, RESIDING AT PATTOTTUKANDY HOUSE,
CHELIYA.P.O., KOILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.R.SREEJITH
SRI.M.PROMODH KUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1 ASSOCIATION FOR WELFARE OF HANDICAPPED
(AWH), POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE KUTTIKKATTOOR, KOZHIKODE-8,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL.
ADDL.R2 ADV.K.N.NAMBOOTHIRI
RECEIVER, ASSOCIATION FOR WELFARE OF HANDICAPPED (AWH),
POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KUTTIKKATTOOR, KOZHIKODE,
HAVING OFFICE AT 11/271 A, CHEROOTI ROAD, KOZHIKODE.
IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 4/4/13 IN I.A..3834/13.
AADL.R3 THE MEDICAL BOARD
MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KOZHIKODE
IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 24/7/15
BY ADV R.SURENDRAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 1668 OF 2013
2
JUDGMENT
Petitioner after having passed Junior Technical High School
joined respondent College for undergoing three year diploma in
Tool and Dye in 2010-2013 batch with admission No.001184. By
the middle of the first academic year, the petitioner developed
frequent bouts of depression, excitement and social phobia and
remained in various hospitals both as inpatient and outpatient
as per certificate Ext.P2. Could not attend the college during
the 2nd year of the course despite having tried to attend. For the
first year, had remitted a sum of Rs.40,000/- and for the second
year, Rs.20,000/-. At the time of admission, petitioner had
submitted original educational certificates ie., JTHSL certificate,
VHSE certificate, Transfer Certificate etc. which have been
withheld by the respondent for the reason that the petitioner is
required to pay the balance tuition fee of the course.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submitted that the stand of the respondent college had been
that as per condition No.9 of the agreement entered into WP(C) NO. 1668 OF 2013
between the college and Government, a student who has
decided to cancel the admission for any reason was liable to pay
the balance tuition fee. The said agreement cannot have a
binding effect on the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the college
also relied upon the said clause and submits that until and
unless the balance tuition fee of Rs.56,000/- is not paid,
educational certificate should not be given.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and
appraised the paper book.
5. The agreement Ext.R2(a) was entered into between
the Government and the College. Petitioner was not a signatory.
Clause 9 of the agreement reads as under:
9. The educational agency is authorized not to refund the tuition fee of the course in the event a student admitted under the management or Government quota, deserts or discontinue his/her studies for any reason at any time after 30 th June 2010. Students allotted under Government quota shall be entitled to seek higher option on or before 30 th June 2010.
Students seeking higher options shall intimate the educational agency and the Director of Technical WP(C) NO. 1668 OF 2013
Education of their decision in writing to withdraw from the allotment under the educational agency on or before 30th June 2010. In such cases the educational agency shall be bound to refund the amounts received/collected. In case, any student admitted to the college decides to cancel the admission for any reason whatsoever after the 30 th June 2010 the educational agency shall be entitled to collect the tuition fees for entire course as fixed under this agreement. The documents pertaining to such student shall be released only on payment of the above amount. The Directorate of Technical Education shall not allot any student to the educational agency after 30th June 2010.
6. Petitioner would have been bound by the above
clause for the reason that the prospectus contained the same
terms and conditions. Terms and conditions of prospectus have
intentionally been withheld by the respondents. In this view of
the matter, I am of the view that the action of the respondents
withholding documents by insisting upon the payment of
balance tuition fee is wholly aberrative and contumacious much
less fallacious.
7. Writ petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to
release the certificate referred to above to the petitioner within WP(C) NO. 1668 OF 2013
a period of one week from the date of receipt of the judgment
without insisting for payment of balance tuition fees and in case
the petitioner does not approach, the respondents are directed
to send the documents by registered post at the latest address
to be given by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL JUDGE nak WP(C) NO. 1668 OF 2013
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 1668/2013
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD OF PETITIONER WITH THE RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE TREATMENT RECORDS OF THE PETITIONER BOTH AS INPATIENT AND OUTPATIENT FROM THE MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KOZHIKODE AND VARIOUS OTHER HOSPITALS
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN REQUEST BY PETITIONER'S FATHER DATED 3.1.2013 TO THE RESPONDENT TO RETURN PETITIONER'S CERTIFICATES.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT R2(A) TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 31.5.2010 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE SECOND RESPONDENT SOCIETY AND THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!