Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7153 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 22966 OF 2016
PETITIONER:
ZAMRA ENDEAVOURS PVT. LTD.,
DOOR NO.32/1131/D,
MANAKKATT BUILDING,
CHANGAMPUZHA NAGAR (PO),
SOUTH KALAMASSERY, KOCHI-682033,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
SRI.M.A.RIYAZ.
BY ADVS.
SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH
SMT.AMRIN FATHIMA
SRI.MITHUN BABY JOHN
SRI.J.RAMKUMAR
SRI.N.SATHEESH KUMARNEMMARA
SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU
SMT.ARYA RAGHUNATH
SRI.P.U.VINOD KUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL),
ERNAKULAM, PIN-682016.
2 THE SUB REGISTRAR
EDAPPALLY SUB REGISTRY,
EDAPPALLY-682024.
BY ADV.
SRI.RIYAL DEVASSY - GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 23.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).No. 22966 of 2016
:2:
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J.
=========================
W.P.(C).No. 22966 of 2016
==========================
Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2023
JUDGMENT
The petitioner impugns Ext.P2 order of the District Registrar
(General), whereby, their request for registration of a document
was declined, saying that he cannot take a decision thereon -
particularly with respect to its stamp duty - on account of the
pendency of another writ petition, namely, W.P.(C).No.12714 of
2015.
2. This Court had, after hearing the learned counsel for the
parties, earlier passed an interim order on 12.07.2016, to the
following effect:
"Admit.
Issue notice tot the respondents. The 2nd respondent is directed to register Ext.P1 lease deed, provisionally, pending disposal of the writ petition after collecting the stamp duty payable under Schedule 33(a)(v) of the Kerala Stamp Act."
3. It is today submitted by Smt.Arya Raghunath - learned
counsel for the petitioner, that the afore interim order has been
complied with and the document has been registered.
4. Sri.Riyal Devassy - learned Government Pleader, affirmed
that registration of the document is complete; and added that W.P.
(C).No.12714/2015 has also been disposed of. W.P.(C).No. 22966 of 2016
5. Obviously, therefore, nothing remains in this writ petition
because Ext.P2 merely says that no decision on the stamp duty of
the document could be taken by the District Registrar (General),
until W.P.(C).No.12714/2015 is disposed of.
In the afore circumstances, confirming the afore interim
order, I close this writ petition; however, leaving liberty to the 1 st
respondent - District Registrar (General), to initiate and impel any
action against the petitioner or the document in question, however,
subject to law and after affording them necessary opportunities of
being heard, adverting to the judgments of this Court, particularly
in W.P.(C).No.12714/2015.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE anm W.P.(C).No. 22966 of 2016
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22966/2016
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE LEASE DEED PREPARED BY THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 06-5-2016 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!