Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 199 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 16TH POUSHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 293 OF 2023
PETITIONERS:
1 MOHANKUMAR K. G.
AGED 63 YEARS
S/O. K.GOPINATHAN NAIR,
RESIDING AT VYSAKHAN, KOTTARAPARAMBIL,
THAIKATTUKARA P. O., MUTTOM,
ALUVA, ERNAKULAM
PIN - 683 106.
2 RATHEESAN P. P.
AGED 69 YEARS
S/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN, RESIDING AT POKKANCHERY HOUSE,
VYSAKHAN, MARADU P. O.,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 304.
3 SELVARAJ P. S.
AGED 62 YEARS
S/O. SUKUMARAN, PULLICAKAL HOUSE,
KOOMBAYIL JETTY ROAD, S.N. JUNCTION,
PANANGAD P. O., ERNAKULAM,
PIN - 682 506.
4 K.JAYAKUMAR
AGED 63 YEARS
S/O. KRISHNAPILLAI, PINDANIL HOUSE,
NIRAVATHU ROAD, MARADU P. O.,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 304.
5 C.K. JOSE
AGED 67 YEARS
S/O. KURIAN, CHIRAKAL HOUSE,
KIDANGAOOR P. O., ANGAMALI,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683 572.
BY ADV SRI. T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
COCHIN CORPORATION OFFICE,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 019.
2 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
COCHIN MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
VYTTILA ZONAL OFFICE,
(ENGINEERING AND TOWN PLANNING ) VYTTILA,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 019.
WP(C).No.293 OF 2023
2
3 THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER
LSGD, COCHIN MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
VYTTILA ZONAL-OFFICE,
(ENGINEERING AND TOWN PLANNING),
VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM,
PIN - 682 019.
SMT. VIDYA KURIAKOSE - GP
SRI. VIPIN D.G - SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.293 OF 2023
3
JUDGMENT
The petitioners have approached this Court
challenging Exts.P6 and P8 notices whereby coercive
actions have been proposed against them alleging
that they have carried out the construction in breach
of licensing provisions under the Kerala Municipality
Act, 1994.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners
submits that though the petitioners have submitted
Ext.P7 explanation to Ext.P6 notice, Ext.P8 has been
issued to them threatening coercive action.
3. Heard Sri.T.Rajasekharan Nair, the learned
counsel for the petitioners and Sri.D.G.Vipin, the
learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
4. Since Exts.P6 and P8 are only notices and WP(C).No.293 OF 2023
the petitioners have already submitted Ext.P7
explanation, there will be a direction to the 2 nd
respondent to consider Ext.P7 with notice to the
petitioners and the complainant referred to in Ext.P6
and orders shall be passed within a period of one
month from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment. Till orders are passed as above, there
shall not be any coercive steps against the petitioners
pursuant to Exts.P6 and P8.
The writ petition is disposed of with the above
direction.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE
SPR WP(C).No.293 OF 2023
APPENDIX PETITIONER EXHIBITS:-
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE DEED EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS ON 28.07.2000.
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LICENCE ISSUED BY THE CORPORATION IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER DTD.08.11.2000.
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE INVITATION LETTER PUBLISHED DURING THE YEAR 2000. EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE RECEIPT SHOWING THE RENEWAL OF THE LICENCE ISSUED ON 25.02.2022.
EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE RECEIPT SHOWING THE REMITTANCE OF BUILDING TAX. EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 14.10.2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P7 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED BY ONE OF THE PETITIONER DATED 08.11.2022.
EXHIBIT P8 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 20.12.2022 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P9 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 06.03.2021 SUBMITTED THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY ONE BINISH KOYAKKAL.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!