Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.K.Jayasree vs P.V.Mohanan
2023 Latest Caselaw 190 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 190 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2023

Kerala High Court
V.K.Jayasree vs P.V.Mohanan on 6 January, 2023
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                            PRESENT
       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
    FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 16TH POUSHA, 1944



                 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1089 OF 2007

JUDGMENT IN OP NO.28077/1999 DATED 19.12.2005 OF HIGH COURT OF
                            KERALA


PETITIONER:

         V.K.JAYASREE
         W/O V.K.UNNIKRISHNAN, AGED 49 YEARS,
         HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT, R.M.V.HIGH SCHOOL,
         PERINJANAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

         BY ADV SRI.B.K.PURUSHOTHAMAN


RESPONDENT:

         P.V.MOHANAN
         (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN),
         DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD,
         THRISSUR DISTRICT.


         SMT NISHA BOSE, SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER



     THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 06.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
 Cont.Case(C) 1089 of 2007                  2




                                   JUDGMENT

This Contempt Case is preferred alleging non-compliance of the

directions issued by this Court in the judgment dated 19.12.2005 in O.P

No.28077 of 1999. When the matter was taken up on 19.12.2022, there was

no representation for the petitioner and hence the matter was posted today.

Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner.

2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent wherein it is

stated that the Manager of MVHSS, Perinjanam, had appointed the petitioner

herein as HSA (Physical Science) from 28.09.1996 to 27.9.1998 against the

leave vacancy of certain P.A Sukumaran, HSA who had entered on Leave

without Allowance for the period. The respondent rejected the appointment for

the reason that there were already 11 posts of HSA (Science) in total, and for

the reason that further appointments in that category will exceed the

sanctioned number of posts. Though an appeal was preferred, the same was

also rejected by the DPI. Later, the petitioner was appointed again as HSA

(Physical Science) at RMV HSS, Perinjanam, from 28.09.1998 onwards in the

leave vacancy of Sri. P.K. Sukumaran, who entered on leave from 28.09.1998

till the date of his retirement on 31.03.1999. However, approval to the

appointment of the petitioner was rejected by order dated 6.11.1998 on the

ground that the appointment order was issued by the correspondent instead of

the manager and for the failure to furnish the required documents.

3. Whileso, the petitioner preferred O.P No.28077 of 1999 seeking

issuance of directions to the respondents to approve the appointment of the

petitioner for the period from 28.09.1996 to 27.09.1998 and from 28.09.1998

onwards and to release salary and all consequential reliefs. By an interim order

dated 11.11.1999, this Court stayed the orders rejecting the grant of approval.

Later by judgment dated 19.12.2005, the original petition was disposed of in

terms of the interim order.

4. It is stated that the respondent has approved the appointment of

Smt.V.K.Jayasree as HSA (Physical Science) for the period from 28.09.1996 to

27.09.1998, provisionally subject to further orders from the Government. It is

further stated that the 2nd appointment of Smt.V.K.Jayasree was made against

the vacancy of Sri. P.K Sukumaran, who availed leave from 28.09.1998 till his

retirement. However, no leave was sanctioned to Sri.P.K.Sukumaran beyond

27.09.1998. Therefore, according to the respondent, there is no established

vacancy to justify the appointment of the petitioner with effect from 28.09.1998

onwards.

It was in the said circumstances that the approval of the petitioner as

HSA (Physical Science) from 28.09.1998 to 31.03.1999 was rejected. Having

considered the assertions in the affidavit, I do not think that any case of

contempt is made out.

This Contempt Case is closed.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE IAP

APPENDIX OF CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) NO.1089 OF 2007

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE 1        TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CMP.47686/99 IN
                  O.P NO.28077/99 DATED 11.11.99 OF THIS
                  HON'BLE COURT

ANNEXURE 2        CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT IN
                  O.P.NO.28977/99 DATED 19.12.2005 OF THIS
                  HON'BLE COURT

ANNEXURE 3        TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.B6-2346/06
                  DTD.30.9.2006 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT

ANNEXURE 4        TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.B6/2346/07 DATED
                  14.06.2007 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter