Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 130 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 16TH POUSHA, 1944
BAIL APPL. NO. 10595 OF 2022
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 & 3:
1 VINEESH P. NAIR,AGED 36 YEARS
S/O. PREMACHANDRAN NAIR,
AGED 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT PANKAJ HOUSE,
HOUSE NO. 114 B, SWATHI NAGAR LANE,
PEROORKADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695005
2 KIRAN .M,AGED 34 YEARS
S/O. MURALEEDHARAN,
AGED 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT UTHRADAM, MYLADI,
PULIYARAKONAM P.O, VILAPPIL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN -
695573
BY ADVS.
A.CHANDRA BABU
A.ABDUL HAKKIM
RESPONDENTS/STATE:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
PIN - 682031
2 SHO, PEROORKADA,
PEROORKADA POLICE STATION,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695005
OTHER PRESENT:
PP:Seetha S
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
B.A. No.10595 of 2022 2
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
-------------------
B.A. No.10595 of 2022
----------------------------
Dated this the 6th day of January, 2023
ORDER
Application for anticipatory bail.
2. Petitioners are accused Nos.1 & 3 in Crime
No.1520 of 2022 of Peroorkada Police Station,
Thiruvananthapuram registered alleging commission of
offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 451,
323, 325 r/w S.34 of IPC. Thereafter, on 17.12.2022
a report was filed deleting Section 451 and
incorporated Section 452 IPC.
3. The prosecution allegation is that, on
27.11.2022 the petitioners along with the 2nd accused
trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant
and inflicted injury, and thereby the accused
committed the above said offences.
4. The petitioners submit that they have been
falsely implicated in the above said crime and even
going by the prosecution allegation an offence under
Section 452 IPC is not attracted in the facts and
circumstances of the present case. Further case of
the petitioners is that the occurrence was on
27.11.2022, but the crime was registered only on
11.12.2022, there was an unexplained delay of 14
days in filing the FIR. Petitioners further submit
that they have no other criminal antecedents.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned Public Prosecutor.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the
application for bail mainly contending that serious
overt acts are alleged against the 1st petitioner
who hit on the face of the defacto complainant and
he sustained serious injuries. Learned Public
Prosecutor further submitted that the petitioners
have no other criminal antecedents.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of
the case, and nature of the allegations, I am of the
opinion that custodial interrogation is not required
for the purpose of investigation and only a limited
custody be granted for the same. I am inclined to
grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but on
stringent conditions. The above bail application is
allowed with the following directions. The
petitioners shall surrender before the investigating
officer on 12.01.2023 and make themselves available
for interrogation on that day or on any other
day/days and time as directed by the investigating
officer. The petitioners shall co-operate with the
investigation. In the event of arrest of the
petitioners in Crime No.1520 of 2022 of
Peroorkada Police Station, they shall be produced
before the jurisdictional Court on the same day and
be released on bail on the following conditions:
(i) The petitioners shall execute a bond for sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;
(ii) The petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime No.1520 of 2022 of Peroorkada Police Station, on every Saturday at 11 am, till the final report is filed and also appear as and when summoned to do so;
(iii) The petitioners shall not tamper with any evidence;
(iv) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise
to any witness acquainted with them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;
(v) The petitioners shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.
If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated,
the Investigating Officer in Crime No.1520 of 2022
of Peroorkada Police Station, may file an
application before the jurisdictional court for
cancellation of bail.
It is made clear that it is within the power of
the police to investigate the matter and if
necessary to effect recoveries on the information if
any given by any of the petitioners even when the
petitioners are on bail as per the judgment of the
Apex Court in Sushila Aggarwal and others v. State
(NCT of Delhi) and another (2020 (1) KHC 663).
sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM,JUDGE
pm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!