Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1784 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
Wednesday, the 1st day of February 2023 / 12th Magha, 1944
IA.NO.3/2022 IN WP(C) NO. 30274 OF 2022(H)
APPLICANTS/RESPONDENTS IN WP(C):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION),
GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
-695 001.
3. DISASTER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA, 689645.
4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION & ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF
KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033.
5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PATHANAMTHITTA, IRRIGATION SUB
DIVISION, PATHANAMTHITTA-689641.
6. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION SUB DIVISION, PATHANAMTHITTA-689641.
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN WP(C):
P.K.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR, S/O. KUMARAPILLAI, PADINJARETHIKKOYIPURATHU
HOUSE, POOVATHOOR P.O, NEAR NEW POST OFFICE, THIRUVALLA, KOIPURAM,
PATHANAMTHITTA, KERALA - 689531 .
Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to extend the time
limit prescribed in the judgment dated 20-10-2022 in WP(C) No.30274/2022
by a further period of 2 months from 09-12-2022.
This Application coming on for orders upon perusing the application
and the affidavit filed in support thereof, and this court's judgment
dated 20-10-2022 and upon hearing the arguments of SENIOR GOVERNMENT
PLEADER for the Petitioners in IA/Respondents in WP(C) and M/s.SREEDEVI
KYLASANATH, ACHUTH KYLAS, JOSELAL GEORGE, R.MAHESH MENON, DEAGO JOHN K,
Advocates for the Respondent in IA/Petitioner in WP(C),the court passed
the following:
V.G.ARUN, J.
...................................................................
I.A No.3 of 2022
IN
W.P(C) No.30274 of 2022
.....................................................................
Dated this the 1st day of February, 2023
ORDER
This is an application seeking extension of the time
stipulated in the judgment for considering the petitioner's
representation. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner raised
strong objection against grant of time, pointing out that the
direction is only to consider the representation and that, in
connected cases, applications for extension of time was filed
within the period stipulated, whereas in the case at hand,
extension is being sought after expiry of period. In spite of
the objection, I am inclined to grant the extension, but as a
last chance.
Accordingly, the I.A is allowed, the time limit stipulated
in the judgment is extended upto 09.02.2022.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE
SJ
01-02-2023 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!