Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1723 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 12TH MAGHA, 1944
WP(CRL.) NO. 68 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
LIJIN VARGHESE
AGED 25 YEARS
S/O VARGHESE.P.M,
PADIPURACKAL HOUSE,
THANNITHODU.P.O, KONNI,
PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,
PIN - 689699
BY ADVS.
S.SAJU
A.V.SAJAN
ANJANADEVI.G
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REP. BY THE HOME SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
2 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF PATHANAMTHITTA,
PATHANAMTHITTA P.O, PIN - 689045
3 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
THANNITHODU POLICE STATION,
PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689699
4 SHIJU LAL
AGED 50 YEARS
S/O. SURENDRAN, NEDUMPALLIL HOUSE, THANNITHIDU P.O,
KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 68969
SRI. SAIGY JACOB PALATTY-SR.GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P (Crl.) No.68 of 2023
2
ALEXANDER THOMAS & C.S.SUDHA, JJ.
------------------------------------------------------------------
W.P (Crl.) No.68 of 2023
------------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 1st day of February, 2023
JUDGMENT
Alexander Thomas , J.
The prayers in the afore-captioned W.P.(Crl.) seeking for habeas
corpus are as follows:
"a) To issue a writ of Habeas corpus and command the respondents no 1 to 3 to produce Anjana Lal, aged 17 years and 4 months, D/o Shiju Lal, address at Nedumpilli House, Thannithodu P.O. Konni, Pathanamthitta district Pin- 689699, before this Hon'ble Court from the wrongful confinement and illegal detention by the 4th respondent and set her at liberty.
b) Pass such other and further directions or order or writ in favour of the petitioner, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper."
2. Heard Sri.Saju S.Nair, the learned counsel for the
appellant and Sri.Saigi Jacob Palathy, the learned Public Prosecutor
appearing for the official respondents 1 to 3.
3. The case set up in this W.P.(Crl) is to the effect that the
petitioner herein, aged 25 years, is having a love affair with the alleged
detenue (Anjana Lal), aged 17 years and 4 months, daughter of R-4 and
reliably it is learnt that, of late, the alleged detenue is under the illegal
detention or wrongful confinement of R-4 and that the petitioner is not W.P (Crl.) No.68 of 2023
able to interact with her and that this Court may intervene in the matter
etc. We had requested the learned Public Prosecutor to get instructions
on the matter and we have also directed the Secretary, District Legal
Services Authority (DLSA), Pathanamthitta, to seek the assistance of R-3
Station House Officer and a woman Police Official and visit the residence
of R-4 and then to record the statement of the minor alleged detenue,
Anjana Lal, as to whether she is facing any harm or threat to her well-
being from anyone in her house and also to record the statement of R-4.
We also directed that, as the mother of the alleged detenue is now in
Kuwait, steps should be taken by R3-SHO to record the statement of the
mother of the alleged detenue through video call.
4. Today, when the matter has been taken up for
consideration, the Secretary, DLSA Pathanamthitta has given report in
the matter, along with the statement recorded by him from the alleged
detenue. In the said report, the Secretary, DLSA has stated that he had
visited the residence of R-4 and recorded the statement of the alleged
detenue, wherein she told him that she is not under the illegal detention
of her father and she abstained from school for a few days because of her
illness. Further that, she has also apprised the Secretary, DLSA that she
had come to know the petitioner about two years ago through facebook
and he started following her and he was warned by the Vanitha Police W.P (Crl.) No.68 of 2023
Station. Thereafter, there was no face to face interaction between the
alleged detenue and the petitioner but when she was returning from
school on 17/01/2023, the petitioner followed her in a car and the father
of the alleged detenue had intervened in this matter and there occurred a
quarrel between the father and the petitioner etc. Further, the alleged
detenue stated that she has no complaint of ill-treatment or physical
assault against anyone, including her father. Further, the said report
would also indicated that the alleged detenue is staying in the residence
of R-4 along with her maternal grandmother and that the mother of the
detenue is now working in Kuwait. However, we have also gone through
the statement of the alleged detenue recorded by the Secretary, DLSA.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor has also given report of
R-3 SHO in this case, who has also recorded the statements of the alleged
detenue as well as the mother of the alleged detenue. In the said
statement also, the alleged detenue has reiterated that she is not under
the illegal detention or wrongful confinement of her father or anyone else
and that she is not facing any ill-treatment from her father. R-3 SHO has
also written the statement of the mother of the alleged detenue, who is
working in Kuwait, wherein she has stated that the alleged detenue is
happily residing with her father and further that, the alleged detenue has
some breathing problems. The learned Public Prosecutor has also W.P (Crl.) No.68 of 2023
submitted, on the basis of instructions, that the enquiries have revealed
that the petitioner has been constantly following the child, which will
amount to stalking and that the alleged detenue has not completed the
majority age of 18 years and that recently, the police was constrained to
register a crime as Crime No.53/2023 of Pathanamthitta Vanitha police
station, for the offences punishable under Sec.354 D of the IPC and
Section 11(iv) read with Sec.12 of the PoCSO Act, in which the petitioner
herein has been arrayed as the accused. The learned Public Prosecutor
further submits that her final examination for XII standard of CBSE
course will commence this month, in which the alleged detenue has to
appear.
6. The core issue that concerns us in this case for
determination is as to whether the alleged detenue is under the illegal
detention or wrongful confinement of anyone. The abovesaid materials
would clearly indicate that the alleged detenue is voluntarily residing
with her father and maternal grandmother. The Secretary, DLSA has
recorded the statement of the alleged detenue. So also, the police
authorities have also recorded the statement of the alleged detenue and
her mother. We do not have any reasons to disbelieve the abovesaid
factual aspects emanating from these materials. So, the case set up in
this proceedings, as if the alleged detenue is under the illegal detention or W.P (Crl.) No.68 of 2023
wrongful confinement of R-4 or anyone, is absolutely untrue and
incorrect. In that view of the matter, the W.P.(Crl) will stand dismissed.
Sd/-
ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE
Sd/-
C.S.SUDHA, JUDGE
Jms/01.02 W.P (Crl.) No.68 of 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 68/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED NIL WRITTEN BY THE DETENUE TO THE PETITIONER IN TRANSLITERATION FORMAT IN THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER ,2022
Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER WRITTEN BY THE DETENUE DATED NIL TO THE PETITIONER IN TRANSLITERATION FORMAT IN MONTH OF JANUARY, 2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!