Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sunny Mathew @ Sunny vs State Of Kerala
2023 Latest Caselaw 13507 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13507 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2023

Kerala High Court

Sunny Mathew @ Sunny vs State Of Kerala on 21 December, 2023

Author: C.S.Dias

Bench: C.S.Dias

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
       Thursday, the 21st day of December 2023 / 30th Agrahayana, 1945
                CRL.M.APPL.NO.1/2023 IN CRL.A NO. 381 OF 2011
               SC 736/2005 OF THE COURT OF SESSIONS, KASARGOD
PETITIONER/APPELLANT:

     SUNNY MATHEW @ SUNNY AGED 63 YEARS, PERUMBATHALIKUNNEL VEEDU,
     VALLIKKADAVU, MALOM VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.

RESPONDENT:

  1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
     KERALA, ERNAKULAM-31.
  2. REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER,PASSPORT OFFICE, NEAR CO- OPERATIVE
     HOSPITAL, ERANHIPALAM, P.O. MINI BYPASS ROAD, KOZHIKODE, KERALA
     673006 *
  3. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL
     AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI 110001
     *

     *Additional Respondents R2 and R3 are impleaded in the Criminal M.A
1/2023 as per order dated 14/12/2023 in Criminal M.A 2/2023.


     Application praying that in the circumstances stated therein the
High Court be pleased to direct the authority concerned to renew the
passport of the petitioner/appellant and permit him to travel abroad.


     This Application coming on for orders upon perusing the application
and the affidavit filed in support thereof, and upon hearing the arguments
of M/S. M.RAMESH CHANDER (SR.) and ANEESH JOSEPH, Advocates for the
petitioner and public procecutor for R1 and of MANU S, DSG OF INDIA for
the R2 and R3, the court passed the following:
                                           1
Crl.A No.381 of 2011




                                      C.S DIAS,J.
                                   ---------------------------
                                Crl.A No.381 of 2011
                                 -----------------------------
                       Dated this the 21st day of December, 2023

                                      ORDER

The application is filed to direct the second respondent

to renew the passport of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner has stated in the application that he is the

second accused in the above appeal, which is filed

challenging the judgment in SC No.736/2005 of the Court of

Session, Kasargod. The petitioner had applied for renewal of

his passport, but the same has not been done in view of the

pendency of this appeal. The petitioner's daughter is

employed as a Nurse in Dubai for the last couple of years and

she is pregnant. The petitioner is desirous of joining his

daughter in Dubai. Therefore, the petitioner may be granted

permission to apply for renewal of his passport. Hence, the

application.

3. Heard; Sri.Bejoy Joseph P.J, the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor

appearing for the first respondent and Sri.Manu, the learned

Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing for the

respondents 2 and 3.

4. This Court in S.K.Ashok Kumar v. State of Kerala

[2009 KHC 557], after interpreting the provisions of the

Passports Act and the notifications issued under, has

categorically held that the criminal court, where the

proceeding is pending, is competent to permit an applicant to

depart from India

5. Recently, in Thadevoose Sebastian v. Regional

Passport Officer and another [ 2021 (5) KHC 625], this

Court has laid down broad guidelines for granting permission

to applicants to depart from India, after obtaining a passport.

6. On a consideration of the assertions in the

application, that the crime is of the year 2011, that the

petitioner has been on bail all throughout, that this Court had

suspended the sentence and the law on the point, I am of the

view that the petitioner's request is to be conditionally

allowed by directing the second respondent to issue a

passport in favour of the petitioner, in accordance with law,

for a period of one year, after obtaining an undertaking from

him that he would appear before this Court/Trial Court as and

when directed.

In result;

(i) The application is allowed.

(ii) The second respondent is directed to process the

petitioner's application, in accordance with law, and issue

him with a passport, if he is otherwise eligible, with a validity

for one year, subject to the condition that the petitioner would

appear before the Courts, as and when directed by this Court.

(iii) The second respondent shall obtain the undertaking

from the petitioner, before issuing the passport.

sd/-

      sks/21.12.2023                              C.S.DIAS, JUDGE




21-12-2023                    /True Copy/                     Assistant Registrar
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter