Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Satheesan vs State Of Kerala
2023 Latest Caselaw 9257 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9257 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2023

Kerala High Court
Satheesan vs State Of Kerala on 23 August, 2023
CRL.A No.923/2022                              1/1

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                        PRESENT
                       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
             Wednesday, the 23rd day of August 2023 / 1st Bhadra, 1945
                  UNNUMB. CRMA.NO.1/2023 IN CRL.A NO. 923 OF 2022
             Crl.MC 1731/2022 OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM
   PETITIONER/PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:

          SATHEESAN, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O. AYYAPPANKUTTY, THOZHUTHUNGAL,
          VILANGU, KIZHAKKAMBALAM, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683561.

   RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/STATE & DE- FACTO COMPLAINANT:

      1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROCECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
         KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
      2. KUMARAN.P.A, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O ASHOKAN, PULLANKAVUNGAL HOUSE,
         VILANGU KARA, NEAR KITEX LTD., KIZHAKKAMBALAM, KUNNATHUNADU,
         ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683561


              Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
   affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to rehear the Judgment
   dated 07/10/2022 in CRL.A.No.923/2022 of this Hon'ble Court and allow bail
   to the petitioner.

           This Application coming on for orders on 23/08/2023 and upon
   perusing the application and the affidavit filed in support thereof and
   this court's Judgment dated 07/10/2022 and upon hearing the arguments of
   MUHAMMAD SAJU.N, M.A.NOUSHAD, Advocates for the petitioner and of
   the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for R1 and M/S VINU CHAND, GEEVARGHESE MATHEW
   Advocates for R2, the court on the same day passed the following:

                                          ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner could not produce the relevant medical documents from the hospital at the time of hearing due to his helplessness.

In this matter, the objection raised by the Registy is sustainable. Holding so, this matter is referred back to the Registry.

Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE

23-08-2023 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter